Groundwater level modeling with hybrid artificial intelligence techniques

被引:37
作者
Bahmani, Ramin [1 ]
Ouarda, Taha B. M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] INRS ETE, Canada Res Chair Stat Hydroclimatol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Groundwater modeling; Statistical modeling; Signal processing; Empirical Mode Decomposition; Hybrid Model; IMPROVING FORECASTING ACCURACY; DECOMPOSITION; WAVELET; REGRESSION; MACHINE; CEEMD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125659
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
It is necessary to properly simulate groundwater levels in order to ensure an adequate management of scarce water resources. However, simulating groundwater levels accurately is one of the challenging issues in hydrology because of its complex system. In the current study, Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and M5 model tree (M5) are combined with Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) and Complementary Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (CEEMD) methods for pre-processing input data to produce hybrid models for groundwater simulation. The performance of hybrid models is compared with the outputs of sole GEP and M5 and their counterparts combined with Wavelet transform (WT). The results indicate that pre-processing can improve the performance of the simple models and WT as well as CEEMD are better than EEMD to produce hybrid models. By employing pre-processing techniques, the improvement of R-2 for GEP and M5, regarding Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) as a benchmark, is 13.11%, 6.65% and 8.20% for EEMD-GEP, CEEMD-GEP and CEEMD-M5 respectively, while it is -3.28% for EEMD-M5 for the first data set. For the second data set, the improvement of EEMD-GEP = 103.23%, CEEMD-GEP = 125.81% and CEEMD-M5 = 77.42%, and for the third data set, EEMD-GEP = 76%, CEEMD-GEP = 80% and CEEMD-M5 = 54%. In the second and third data set, the performance of EEMD-M5 decreases again. According to the results, hybrid GEP shows the best performance for groundwater water simulation, while M5 combined with EEMD is not recommended for the simulation due to its weak performance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] An empirical method for approximating stream baseflow time series using groundwater table fluctuations
    Meshgi, Ali
    Schmitter, Petra
    Babovic, Vladan
    Chui, Ting Fong May
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 519 : 1031 - 1041
  • [22] A novel hybrid decomposition-and-ensemble model based on CEEMD and GWO for short-term PM2.5 concentration forecasting
    Niu, Mingfei
    Wang, Yufang
    Sun, Shaolong
    Li, Yongwu
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 134 : 168 - 180
  • [23] Hybrid Wavelet-M5 Model Tree for Rainfall-Runoff Modeling
    Nourani, Vahid
    Tajbakhsh, Ali Davanlou
    Molajou, Amir
    Gokcekus, Huseyin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2019, 24 (05)
  • [24] A Wavelet Based Data Mining Technique for Suspended Sediment Load Modeling
    Nourani, Vahid
    Molajou, Amir
    Tajbakhsh, Ali Davanlou
    Najafi, Hessam
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2019, 33 (05) : 1769 - 1784
  • [25] Data mining based on wavelet and decision tree for rainfall-runoff simulation
    Nourani, Vahid
    Tajbakhsh, Ali Davanlou
    Molajou, Amir
    [J]. HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2019, 50 (01): : 75 - 84
  • [26] Spatiotemporal groundwater level modeling using hybrid artificial intelligence-meshless method
    Nourani, Vahid
    Mousavi, Shahram
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 536 : 10 - 25
  • [27] A Multivariate ANN-Wavelet Approach for Rainfall-Runoff Modeling
    Nourani, Vahid
    Komasi, Mehdi
    Mano, Akira
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2009, 23 (14) : 2877 - 2894
  • [28] Fully nonlinear statistical and machine-learning approaches for hydrological frequency estimation at ungauged sites
    Ouali, D.
    Chebana, F.
    Ouarda, T. B. M. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2017, 9 (02) : 1292 - 1306
  • [29] Noise Reduction for Nonlinear Nonstationary Time Series Data using Averaging Intrinsic Mode Function
    Premanode, Bhusana
    Vongprasert, Jumlong
    Toumazou, Christofer
    [J]. ALGORITHMS, 2013, 6 (03) : 407 - 429
  • [30] Quinlan J. R., 1992, Proceedings of the 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AI '92, P343