Groundwater level modeling with hybrid artificial intelligence techniques

被引:37
作者
Bahmani, Ramin [1 ]
Ouarda, Taha B. M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] INRS ETE, Canada Res Chair Stat Hydroclimatol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Groundwater modeling; Statistical modeling; Signal processing; Empirical Mode Decomposition; Hybrid Model; IMPROVING FORECASTING ACCURACY; DECOMPOSITION; WAVELET; REGRESSION; MACHINE; CEEMD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125659
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
It is necessary to properly simulate groundwater levels in order to ensure an adequate management of scarce water resources. However, simulating groundwater levels accurately is one of the challenging issues in hydrology because of its complex system. In the current study, Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and M5 model tree (M5) are combined with Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) and Complementary Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (CEEMD) methods for pre-processing input data to produce hybrid models for groundwater simulation. The performance of hybrid models is compared with the outputs of sole GEP and M5 and their counterparts combined with Wavelet transform (WT). The results indicate that pre-processing can improve the performance of the simple models and WT as well as CEEMD are better than EEMD to produce hybrid models. By employing pre-processing techniques, the improvement of R-2 for GEP and M5, regarding Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) as a benchmark, is 13.11%, 6.65% and 8.20% for EEMD-GEP, CEEMD-GEP and CEEMD-M5 respectively, while it is -3.28% for EEMD-M5 for the first data set. For the second data set, the improvement of EEMD-GEP = 103.23%, CEEMD-GEP = 125.81% and CEEMD-M5 = 77.42%, and for the third data set, EEMD-GEP = 76%, CEEMD-GEP = 80% and CEEMD-M5 = 54%. In the second and third data set, the performance of EEMD-M5 decreases again. According to the results, hybrid GEP shows the best performance for groundwater water simulation, while M5 combined with EEMD is not recommended for the simulation due to its weak performance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Data mining in hydrology - Invited commentary
    Babovic, V
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2005, 19 (07) : 1511 - 1515
  • [2] Groundwater level simulation using gene expression programming and M5 model tree combined with wavelet transform
    Bahmani, Ramin
    Solgi, Abazar
    Ouarda, Taha B. M. J.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2020, 65 (08): : 1430 - 1442
  • [3] Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning
    Blum, AL
    Langley, P
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 97 (1-2) : 245 - 271
  • [4] Hydrologically Informed Machine Learning for Rainfall-Runoff Modeling: A Genetic Programming-Based Toolkit for Automatic Model Induction
    Chadalawada, Jayashree
    Herath, H. M. V. V.
    Babovic, Vladan
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2020, 56 (04)
  • [5] Regional Frequency Analysis at Ungauged Sites with the Generalized Additive Model
    Chebana, F.
    Charron, C.
    Ouarda, T. B. M. J.
    Martel, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2014, 15 (06) : 2418 - 2428
  • [6] Cormen T. H., 2009, INTRO ALGORITHMS
  • [7] Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks
    Daliakopoulos, IN
    Coulibaly, P
    Tsanis, IK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 309 (1-4) : 229 - 240
  • [8] Ferreira C, 2002, SOFT COMPUTING AND INDUSTRY, P635
  • [9] Ferreira C., 2001, Complex Systems, V13, P87
  • [10] Ferreira C., 2006, GENE EXPRESSION PROG, DOI DOI 10.1007/3-540-32849-1