Impacts of Modifications to a Local Planetary Boundary Layer Scheme on Forecasts of the Great Plains Low-Level Jet Environment

被引:7
作者
Jahn, David E. [1 ]
Gallus, William A., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Geol & Atmospher Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Boundary layer; Jets; Mesoscale forecasting; Numerical weather prediction; forecasting; Parameterization; TURBULENCE CLOSURE-MODEL; PART I; STATE;
D O I
10.1175/WAF-D-18-0036.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The Great Plains low-level jet (LLJ) is influential in the initiation and evolution of nocturnal convection through the northward advection of heat and moisture, as well as convergence in the region of the LLJ nose. However, accurate numerical model forecasts of LLJs remain a challenge, related to the performance of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme in the stable boundary layer. Evaluated here using a series of LLJ cases from the Plains Elevated Convection at Night (PECAN) program are modifications to a commonly used local PBL scheme, Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi-Niino (MYNN), available in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. WRF forecast mean absolute error (MAE) and bias are calculated relative to PECAN rawinsonde observations. The first MYNN modification invokes a new set of constants for the scheme closure equations that, in the vicinity of the LLJ, decreases forecast MAEs of wind speed, potential temperature, and specific humidity more than 19%. For comparison, the Yonsei University (YSU) scheme results in wind speed MAEs 22% lower but specific humidity MAEs 17% greater than in the original MYNN scheme. The second MYNN modification, which incorporates the effects of potential kinetic energy and uses a nonzero mixing length in stable conditions as dependent on bulk shear, reduces wind speed MAEs 66% for levels below the LLJ, but increases MAEs at higher levels. Finally, Rapid Refresh analyses, which are often used for forecast verification, are evaluated here and found to exhibit a relatively large average wind speed bias of 3 m s(-1) in the region below the LLJ, but with relatively small potential temperature and specific humidity biases.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / 1120
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
AUGUSTINE JA, 1994, WEATHER FORECAST, V9, P116, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009<0116:LTPTNM>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   A North American Hourly Assimilation and Model Forecast Cycle: The Rapid Refresh [J].
Benjamin, Stanley G. ;
Weygandt, Stephen S. ;
Brown, John M. ;
Hu, Ming ;
Alexander, Curtis R. ;
Smirnova, Tatiana G. ;
Olson, Joseph B. ;
James, Eric P. ;
Dowell, David C. ;
Grell, Georg A. ;
Lin, Haidao ;
Peckham, Steven E. ;
Smith, Tracy Lorraine ;
Moninger, William R. ;
Kenyon, Jaymes S. ;
Manikin, Geoffrey S. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2016, 144 (04) :1669-1694
[4]  
Chen F, 2001, MON WEATHER REV, V129, P569, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
Clark R, 2016, FP3 ELLIS KS RADIOSO, DOI [10.5065/D6GM85DZ, DOI 10.5065/D6GM85DZ]
[7]   Evaluation of Multiple Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization Schemes in Southeast US Cold Season Severe Thunderstorm Environments [J].
Cohen, Ariel E. ;
Cavallo, Steven M. ;
Coniglio, Michael C. ;
Brooks, Harold E. ;
Jirak, Israel L. .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2017, 32 (05) :1857-1884
[8]   A Review of Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization Schemes and Their Sensitivity in Simulating Southeastern US Cold Season Severe Weather Environments [J].
Cohen, Ariel E. ;
Cavallo, Steven M. ;
Coniglio, Michael C. ;
Brooks, Harold E. .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2015, 30 (03) :591-612
[9]  
DUDHIA J, 1989, J ATMOS SCI, V46, P3077, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<3077:NSOCOD>2.0.CO
[10]  
2