Impact of Drain Placement and Duration on Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis

被引:13
作者
Addison, Poppy [1 ,2 ]
Nauka, Peter C. [1 ,2 ]
Fatakhova, Karina [2 ]
Amodu, Leo [1 ,2 ]
Kohn, Nina [3 ]
Rilo, Horacio L. Rodriguez [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Dept Surg, Hempstead, NY USA
[2] Northwell Hlth, Ctr Dis Pancreas, 400 Community Dr,Off 311, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
[3] Feinstein Inst Med Res, Biostat Unit, Manhasset, NY USA
关键词
Outcomes; Drains; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Whipple; PANCREATIC HEAD RESECTION; DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; MULTICENTER TRIAL; ROUTINE DRAINAGE; RISK SCORE; FISTULA; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; NSQIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.071
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The decisions to routinely place a drain after pancreaticoduodenectomy and how long to leave the drain remain controversial due to conflicting evidence and significant variations in clinical practice. This study aims to address those questions by using a large national database and a rigorous analytical model. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2015-2016 Pancreatectomy Participant Use Data Files were used to identify patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 7583). Univariable and multivariable binomial regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounders and various preoperative risk factors. Cox regression with drain as a time-dependent covariate, conditional on having a drain placed, was used to examine the association between the drain remaining in place and morbidities. Results: Of 7583 patients, drains were placed in 6666 (87.9%). Drain placement decreased the risk of developing serious morbidity (relative risk [RR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.82), overall morbidity (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.72-0.87), and organ space surgical site infection (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.85). Drain placement did not change the risk of developing a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78-1.19). However, for those with drains placed, length of drainage was independently associated with serious morbidity (hazard ratio [HR] 3.06, 95% CI 2.65-3.53), overall morbidity (HR 2.48, 95% CI 2.202.80), and organ space surgical site infection (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.23-1.74). Conclusions: Routine drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy may decrease postoperative complications, including serious morbidity, overall morbidity, and organ space surgical site infections; however, length of drainage was associated with increased risk of the previously-named complications. These results support the routine placement and early removal of intraoperative surgical drains in pancreaticoduodenectomy. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 107
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Pancreatic resection: Drain or no drain? [J].
Adham, Mustapha ;
Chopin-Laly, Xavier ;
Lepilliez, Vincent ;
Gincul, Rodica ;
Valette, Pierre-Jean ;
Ponchon, Thierry .
SURGERY, 2013, 154 (05) :1069-1077
[2]   Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition [J].
Bassi, C ;
Dervenis, C ;
Butturini, G ;
Fingerhut, A ;
Yeo, C ;
Izbicki, J ;
Neoptolemos, J ;
Sarr, M ;
Traverso, W ;
Buchler, M .
SURGERY, 2005, 138 (01) :8-13
[3]   Early Versus Late Drain Removal After Standard Pancreatic Resections Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial [J].
Bassi, Claudio ;
Molinari, Enrico ;
Malleo, Giuseppe ;
Crippa, Stefano ;
Butturini, Giovanni ;
Salvia, Roberto ;
Talamini, Giorgio ;
Pederzoli, Paolo .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (02) :207-214
[4]   Variation in Drain Management After Pancreatoduodenectomy Early Versus Delayed Removal [J].
Beane, Joal D. ;
House, Michael G. ;
Ceppa, Eugene P. ;
Dolejs, Scott C. ;
Pitt, Henry A. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (04) :718-724
[5]   Routine Drainage of the Operative Bed Following Elective Distal Pancreatectomy Does Not Reduce the Occurrence of Complications [J].
Behrman, Stephen W. ;
Zarzaur, Ben L. ;
Parmar, Abhishek ;
Riall, Taylor S. ;
Hall, Bruce L. ;
Pitt, Henry A. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (01) :72-79
[6]   A Prospectively Validated Clinical Risk Score Accurately Predicts Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy [J].
Callery, Mark P. ;
Pratt, Wande B. ;
Kent, Tara S. ;
Chaikof, Elliot L. ;
Vollmer, Charles M., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (01) :1-14
[7]   Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection [J].
Conlon, KC ;
Labow, D ;
Leung, D ;
Smith, A ;
Jarnagin, W ;
Coit, DG ;
Merchant, N ;
Brennan, MF .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (04) :487-493
[8]   Operative Drainage Following Pancreatic Resection Analysis of 1122 Patients Resected Over 5 Years at a Single Institution [J].
Correa-Gallego, Camilo ;
Brennan, Murray F. ;
D'Angelica, Michael ;
Fong, Yuman ;
DeMatteo, Ronald P. ;
Kingham, T. Peter ;
Jarnagin, William R. ;
Allen, Peter J. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 258 (06) :1051-1058
[9]   Pancreatic resection without routine intraperitoneal drainage [J].
Fisher, William E. ;
Hodges, Sally E. ;
Silberfein, Eric J. ;
Artinyan, Avo ;
Ahern, Charlotte H. ;
Jo, Eunji ;
Brunicardi, F. Charles .
HPB, 2011, 13 (07) :503-510
[10]   Early Drain Removal-The Middle Ground Between the Drain Versus No Drain Debate in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy A Prospective Validation Study [J].
Fong, Zhi Ven ;
Correa-Gallego, Camilo ;
Ferrone, Cristina R. ;
Veillette, Gregory R. ;
Warshaw, Andrew L. ;
Lillemoe, Keith D. ;
Fernandez-del Castillo, Carlos .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02) :378-383