Multi-step membrane process for biogas upgrading

被引:18
作者
Brunetti, Adele [1 ]
Barbieri, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Membrane Technol ITM CNR, Natl Res Council, Via Pietro BUCCI, Cubo 17C, CS, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, Italy
关键词
Biomethane; CH4; CO2; selectivity; separation; GAS SEPARATION; CO2; TECHNOLOGIES; OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120454
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In this work, we proposed a multistep membrane process for the upgrading of a mixture containing 60% of methane and 40% of carbon dioxide, considering three case studies that allow to cover a wide range of CO2 permeability (from 5 to 180 Barrer) and CO2/CH4 selectivity (from 30 to 200). The aim is to investigate to what extend the variation in steps number positively affects the separation performance as well as reduces the total membrane area and recycled flow rate required to obtain a methane stream at a purity of 98%.The multistep paths necessary to achieve the final target have been defined by using performance maps of methane purity versus its recovery.A higher number of steps leads to a significant reduction of membrane area (e.g., from 580 to 180 m(2)) and promotes the methane recovery, allowing to recover a purer carbon dioxide stream in the permeate (e.g., from 87.4 to 97.9%). Fixing the steps number, the higher CO2 permeability allows to save membrane area but provides more methane losses on the permeate side. Differently, an increment of selectivity reflects in higher methane recovery (i.e., carbon dioxide purity on the permeate side) but lower retentate concentration.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modeling an aerobic biotrickling filter for biogas desulfurization through a multi-step oxidation mechanism
    Lopez, L. R.
    Dorado, A. D.
    Mora, M.
    Gamisans, X.
    Lafuente, J.
    Gabriel, D.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2016, 294 : 447 - 457
  • [22] Single-step purification of raw biogas to biomethane quality by hollow fiber membranes without any pretreatment - An innovation in biogas upgrading
    Zak, Michal
    Bendova, Helena
    Friess, Karel
    Bara, Jason E.
    Izak, Pavel
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 203 : 36 - 40
  • [23] Upgrading Biogas to Biomethane Using Membrane Separation
    Vrbova, Veronika
    Ciahotny, Karel
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2017, 31 (09) : 9393 - 9401
  • [24] Analysis of the Techno-Economic Competitiveness of a Three-Stage Membrane Separation Process for Biogas Upgrading Using a Biopolymer-Based Mixed-Matrix Membrane
    Abejon, Ricardo
    Torre-Celeizabal, Andrea
    Casado-Coterillo, Clara
    Garea, Aurora
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (03) : 1297 - 1308
  • [25] The recovery of valuable components from secondary lead dust by a multi-step hydrometallurgical process
    Ye, Longgang
    Song, Shichang
    Yang, Shenghai
    Chen, Yongming
    Liu, Shufen
    HYDROMETALLURGY, 2023, 222
  • [26] Upgrading of biogas to bio-methane with chemical absorption process: simulation and environmental impact
    Leonzio, Grazia
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 131 : 364 - 375
  • [27] Upgrading Biogas from Small Agricultural Sources into Biomethane by Membrane Separation
    Janusz-Cygan, Aleksandra
    Jaschik, Jolanta
    Tanczyk, Marek
    MEMBRANES, 2021, 11 (12)
  • [28] Membrane materials for biogas purification and upgrading: Fundamentals, recent advances and challenges
    Rodero, Maria del Rosario
    Munoz, Raul
    Gonzalez-Sanchez, Armando
    Ruiz, Hector A.
    Quijano, Guillermo
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (05):
  • [29] A crucial review on the challenges and recent gas membrane development for biogas upgrading
    Fajrina, Nur
    Yusof, Norhaniza
    Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi
    Aziz, Farhana
    Bilad, Muhammad Roil
    Alkahtani, Meshel
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (03):
  • [30] Assessment of membrane plants for biogas upgrading to biomethane at zero methane emission
    Valenti, Gianluca
    Arcidiacono, Alessandro
    Nieto Ruiz, Jose Antonio
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2016, 85 : 35 - 47