Analysis of Implant Strength After Implantoplasty in Three Implant-Abutment Connection Designs: An In Vitro Study

被引:28
作者
Alexandre Gehrke, Sergio [1 ,2 ]
Aramburu Junior, Jaime Sarda [1 ,3 ]
Dedavid, Berenice Anina [4 ]
Shibli, Jamil Awad [5 ]
机构
[1] Biotecnos Technol & Sci, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[2] Catholic Univ Murcia, Master Course Lab & Clin Res, Murcia, Spain
[3] Fac Itapiranga, Canarias, Spain
[4] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Mat Engn, Postgrad Program, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[5] Univ Guarulhos, Dent Res Div, Dept Periodontol & Oral Implantol, Postgrad Program Implantol, Guarulhos, SP, Brazil
关键词
dental implant; fracture mode; fracture strength; implant connection; implantoplasty; 3-YEAR CLINICAL-TRIAL; SHAPED ORAL IMPLANTS; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; SURGICAL THERAPY; RESECTIVE SURGERY; EUROPEAN WORKSHOP; BONE; PREVALENCE; CONSENSUS; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.4399
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the resistance to static fatigue of implants with different connections before and after implantoplasty. Materials and Methods: Sixty conical implants and 60 abutments were used; 4-mm-diameter versions were available for each model. Three groups (n = 20) were established based on the following implant connections: external hexagon (group 1), internal hexagon (group 2), and Morse taper (group 3). The implants of each group were submitted to a compressive load before (n = 10) and after the implantoplasty (n = 10). The wear was performed in a mechanical lathe machine using a carbide bur, and the final dimensions of each sample were measured. All groups were subjected to quasi-static loading at a 30-degree angle to the implant axis in a universal testing machine and 5 mm out of the implant support. Results: After the implantoplasty, the mean final diameter was 3.13 +/- 0.033 mm for group 1, 3.23 +/- 0.023 mm for group 2, and 3.25 +/- 0.03 mm for group 3. The mean fracture strengths for the groups before and after the implantoplasty were, respectively, 773.1 +/- 13.16 N and 487.1 +/- 93.72 N in group 1; 829.4 +/- 14.12 N and 495.7 +/- 85.24 N in group 2; and 898.1 +/- 19.25 N and 717.6 +/- 77.25 N in group 3. Conclusion: Resistance to loading decreased significantly after implantoplasty, and varied among the three implant connection designs.
引用
收藏
页码:E65 / E70
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[31]   Outcome of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: results from a 2-year prospective clinical study in humans [J].
Serino, Giovanni ;
Turri, Alberto .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (11) :1214-1220
[32]  
Shibli Jamil Awad, 2007, J Oral Implantol, V33, P232, DOI 10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[232:ISAAME]2.0.CO
[33]  
2
[34]  
Smiler Dennis, 2006, Implant Dent, V15, P122, DOI 10.1097/01.id.0000217780.69637.cc
[35]   Clinical outcome of a nonsurgical and surgical treatment protocol in different types of peri-implantitis: A case series [J].
Thierbach, Rene ;
Eger, Thomas .
QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 44 (02) :137-148
[36]   Regenerative Treatment of Peri-Implantitis Bone Defects with a Combination of Autologous Bone and a Demineralized Xenogenic Bone Graft: A Series of 36 Defects [J].
Wiltfang, Joerg ;
Zernial, Oliver ;
Behrens, Eleonore ;
Schlegel, Andreas ;
Warnke, Patrick H. ;
Becker, Stephan T. .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (03) :421-427
[37]  
Wilwerding T, 1990, Pediatr Dent, V12, P170
[38]   Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases [J].
Zitzmann, Nicola U. ;
Berglundh, Tord .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 35 :286-291