Sustainability impact assessment to improve food security of smallholders in Tanzania

被引:33
作者
Schindler, Jana [1 ,2 ]
Graef, Frieder [1 ]
Koenig, Hannes Jochen [1 ]
Mchau, Devotha [3 ]
Saidia, Paul [4 ]
Sieber, Stefan [5 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Inst Land Use Syst, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Fac Agr & Hort, Invalidenstr 42, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[3] ARI Hombolo Makutupora, POB 1676, Dodoma, Tanzania
[4] SUA Morogoro, Dept Crop Sci & Prod, POB 3005, Morogoro, Tanzania
[5] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Inst Socio Econ, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
关键词
Sustainability; Impact assessment; Food security; Smallholder farmers; Agricultural upgrading strategies; Tanzania; AGRICULTURE; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; INTENSIFICATION; STRATEGIES; SCENARIOS; FRAMEWORK; RESOURCE; GENDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2016.04.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper was to assess the sustainability impacts of planned agricultural development interventions, so called upgrading strategies (UPS), to enhance food security and to identify what advantages and risks are assessed from the farmer's point of view in regards to social life, the economy and the environment. We developed a participatory methodological procedure that links food security and sustainable development. Farmers in four different case study villages in rural Tanzania chose their priority UPS. For these UPS, they assessed the impacts on locally relevant food security criteria. The positive impacts identified were mainly attributed to increased agricultural production and its related positive impacts such as increased income and improved access to necessary means to diversify the diet. However, several risks of certain UPS were also indicated by farmers, such as increased workload, high maintenance costs, higher competition among farmers, loss of traditional knowledge and social conflicts. We discussed the strong interdependence of socio-economic and environmental criteria to improve food security for small-scale farmers and analysed several trade-offs in regards to UPS choices and food security criteria. We also identified and discussed the advantages and challenges of our methodological approach. In conclusion, the participatory impact assessment on the farmer level allowed a locally specific analysis of the various positive and negative impacts of UPS on social life, the economy and the environment. We emphasize that only a development approach that considers social, economic and environmental challenges simultaneously can enhance food security. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 63
页数:12
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis: a practical method for project planning and evaluation [J].
Alvarez, Sophie ;
Douthwaite, Boru ;
Thiele, Graham ;
Mackay, Ronald ;
Cordoba, Diana ;
Tehelen, Katherine .
DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2010, 20 (08) :946-958
[2]  
[Anonymous], FOOD SECUR
[3]  
[Anonymous], POSTHARVEST OPERATIO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2012. Economic growth is necessary but not sufficient to accelerate reduction of hunger and malnutrition
[5]  
[Anonymous], WHAT IS FOOD SEC
[6]  
[Anonymous], OPERATIONAL ASSESSME
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, AGR CROSSR
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Sustainability Assessment: criteria, processes and applications
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2012, WATER HARVESTING TEC
[10]  
[Anonymous], TANZ 2002 CENS AN RE