Relationship between maternal age and labor induction duration and outcomes in nulliparous women

被引:3
作者
Teal, Elizabeth Nicole [1 ]
Gaw, Stephanie L. [2 ]
Has, Phinnara [3 ]
Lewkowitz, Adam K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Maternal Fetal Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Brown Univ, Women & Infants Hosp, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Induction of labor; maternal age; labor induction duration; prolonged induction; advanced maternal age; obstetrics; outcomes; perinatal outcomes; pregnancy; CESAREAN DELIVERY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2021.1932807
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the relationship between maternal age and labor induction duration among nulliparous women. Methods This retrospective cohort study included nulliparous women with non-anomalous, term, singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction with intact membranes at a tertiary-care academic hospital from January 2015 to April 2017. Maternal age was stratified as follows: <25 years, 25-29 years, 30-34 years, 35-39 years, and >= 40 years. The primary outcome was induction duration, defined as the time the first induction agent was administered to time of birth. Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery, cesarean indication, hemorrhage, blood transfusion, peripartum infection, composite neonatal morbidity, and induction duration among the subset of women who ultimately underwent cesarean. The data were analyzed using chi-squared and Fisher exact tests. Multivariable regression was used to adjust for maternal race/ethnicity, maternal body mass index, gestational age at start of induction, and induction indication. Hazard ratios were used to calculate induction duration among women who underwent cesarean delivery, stratified by age and adjusted by the same variables. Results Among the 955 patients included, the median induction duration was 32.3 h (interquartile range (IQR) 20.4-41.0 h). Women 40 years and older had a slight increase in induction duration (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.05) and a seven-fold increased risk of induction lasting 60 h or longer (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 7.3, CI 1.8-29.9) when compared to those under 25 years of age; otherwise, there was no association between maternal age and labor induction duration. There was no association between age and cesarean delivery, cesarean indication, hemorrhage, transfusion, peripartum infection, or adverse neonatal outcomes. Furthermore, there was no association between maternal age and induction duration even among women who ultimately underwent cesarean. Conclusion We found no association between maternal age and induction duration for women under 40 years of age. For women 40 years of age and older, these was an increased risk of labor induction lasting 60 h or longer. Despite this, we found no association between maternal age and cesarean delivery or other adverse maternal or fetal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:6973 / 6980
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Obstet Gynecol, V133, pe151, DOI [10.1097/aog.0000000000003083, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003083]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WILLIAMS OBSTET
[3]  
Caughey AB, 2015, CLIN OBSTET GYNECOL, V58, P207, DOI [10.1097/grf.0000000000000111, 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000111]
[4]  
Cheng YW., 2012, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V207, p502.
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Obstet Gynecol, V130, pe217, DOI [10.1097/aog.0000000000002351, 10.1097/aog.0000000000002398, 10.1097/00006250-201711000-00051, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002351, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002398]
[6]   Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women [J].
Grobman, William A. ;
Rice, Madeline M. ;
Reddy, Uma M. ;
Tita, Alan T. N. ;
Silver, Robert M. ;
Mallett, Gail ;
Hill, Kim ;
Thom, Elizabeth A. ;
El-Sayed, Yasser Y. ;
Perez-Delboy, Annette ;
Rouse, Dwight J. ;
Saade, George R. ;
Boggess, Kim A. ;
Chauhan, Suneet P. ;
Iams, Jay D. ;
Chien, Edward K. ;
Casey, Brian M. ;
Gibbs, Ronald S. ;
Srinivas, Sindhu K. ;
Swamy, Geeta K. ;
Simhan, Hyagriv N. ;
Macones, George A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (06) :513-523
[7]   Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates [J].
Heffner, LJ ;
Elkin, E ;
Fretts, RC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (02) :287-293
[8]  
Martin J.A., 2019, BIRTHS US 2018
[9]  
Martinez J, 2020, Border Hispanisms, P1, DOI 10.7560/321713
[10]  
Mathews T J, 2016, NCHS Data Brief, P1