Proximate analysis based prediction of gross calorific value of coals: A comparison of support vector machine, alternating conditional expectation and artificial neural network

被引:85
作者
Feng, Qihong [1 ]
Zhang, Jiyuan [1 ]
Zhang, Xianmin [1 ]
Wen, Shengming [2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Sch Petr Engn, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] PetroChina Coalbed Methane Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gross calorific value; Alternating conditional expectation; Artificial neural network; Support vector machine; Proximate analysis; MULTIPLE-REGRESSION; CONSUMPTION; METHANE; MODEL; LOAD; ALGORITHM; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.09.001
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
The gross calorific value (GCV) of coal is important in both the direct use and conversion into other fuel forms of coals. The measurement of GCV usually requires sophisticated bomb calorimetric experimental apparatus and expertise, whereas proximate analysis is much cheaper, easier and faster to conduct. This paper presents the application of three regression models, i.e., support vector machine (SVM), alternating conditional expectation (ACE) and back propagation neural network (BPNN) to predict the GCV of coals based on proximate analysis information. Analytical data of 76 Chinese coal samples, with a large variation in rank were acquired and used as input into these models. The modeling results show that: 1) all three methods are generally capable of tracking the variation trend of GCV with the proximate analysis parameters; 2) SVM performs the best in terms of generalization capability among the models investigated; 3) BPNN has the potential to outperform SVM in the training stage and ACE in both training and testing stages; however, its prediction accuracy is dramatically affected by the model parameters including hidden neuron number, learning rate and initial weights; 4) ACE performs slightly better with respect to the generalization capability than does BPNN, on an averaged scale. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 129
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proximate analysis based multiple regression models for higher heating value estimation of low rank coals
    Akkaya, Ali Volkan
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 90 (02) : 165 - 170
  • [2] [Anonymous], SPEFE JUN
  • [3] Modelling of an environmental parameter by use of the alternating conditional expectation method
    Blanco, M
    Coello, J
    Maspoch, S
    Puigdomènech, AR
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1999, 46 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [4] BREIMAN L, 1985, J AM STAT ASSOC, V80, P580, DOI 10.2307/2288473
  • [5] Techno-economic impacts of shale gas on cellulosic biofuel pathways
    Brown, Tristan R.
    Wright, Mark M.
    [J]. FUEL, 2014, 117 : 989 - 995
  • [6] A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels
    Channiwala, SA
    Parikh, PP
    [J]. FUEL, 2002, 81 (08) : 1051 - 1063
  • [7] Explaining the relationship between common coal analyses and Afghan coal parameters using statistical modeling methods
    Chelgani, S. Chehreh
    Makaremi, S.
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 110 : 79 - 85
  • [8] Estimation of free-swelling index based on coal analysis using multivariable regression and artificial neural network
    Chelgani, S. Chehreh
    Hower, James C.
    Hart, B.
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 92 (03) : 349 - 355
  • [9] Simultaneous prediction of coal rank parameters based on ultimate analysis using regression and artificial neural network
    Chelgani, S. Chehreh
    Mesroghli, Sh.
    Hower, James C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2010, 83 (01) : 31 - 34
  • [10] Maximum solid concentrations of coal water slurries predicted by neural network models
    Cheng, Jun
    Li, Yanchang
    Zhou, Junhu
    Liu, Jianzhong
    Cen, Kefa
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 91 (12) : 1832 - 1838