Well-being, Disability, and Choosing Children

被引:8
作者
Barker, Matthew J. [1 ]
Wilson, Robert A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] La Trobe Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PROCREATIVE BENEFICENCE; HEALTH; SATISFACTION; PEOPLE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1093/mind/fzy039
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The view that it is better for life to be created free from disability is pervasive in both common sense and philosophy. We cast doubt on this view by focusing on an influential line of thinking that manifests it. That thinking begins with a widely-discussed principle, Procreative Beneficence, and draws conclusions about parental choice and disability. After reconstructing two versions of this argument, we critique the first by exploring the relationship between different understandings of well-being and disability, and the second by focusing briefly on the idea of a significant reason. By placing these results within the broader historical and ongoing contexts in which the lives of those with disabilities have been deemed of inferior quality, we conclude with a call for greater humility about disability and well-being in thought and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 328
页数:24
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Alexandrova A., 2017, A Philosophy for the Science of Well-Being
[2]  
Amundson R., 2005, QUALITY LIFE HUMAN D
[3]  
[Anonymous], SORTING SOC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SPECIES NEW INTERDIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1976, INT CLASS IMP DIS HA
[6]  
Asch A., 2005, Quality of life and human difference: Genetic testing, health care, and disability
[7]   PROBABILITY AND FREEDOM: A REPLY TO VICENS REPLY [J].
Barnes, Elizabeth .
RES PHILOSOPHICA, 2016, 93 (01) :295-309
[8]   Valuing Disability, Causing Disability [J].
Barnes, Elizabeth .
ETHICS, 2014, 125 (01) :88-113
[9]   Disability, Minority, and Difference [J].
Barnes, Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHILOSOPHY, 2009, 26 (04) :337-355
[10]  
Barnes E, 2009, PHILOS PERSPECT, V23, P1