Ceramic membrane behavior in textile wastewater ultrafiltration

Textile industries are rated as the most polluting among all industrial sectors taking into account both wastewater volume and composition. In order to be able to reuse these effluents, membrane technologies have been proven as a viable alternative. However, these technologies show some drawbacks, such as the retentate stream management and the worsening of their performance due to membrane fouling. Therefore, effluents must be pre-treated in order to prevent fouling. Membrane technologies also provide some alternatives for these pre-treatments by means of the application of ceramic ultrafiltration among others. This work studies the performance of ceramic membranes by carrying out experiments with three commercial ceramic membranes with molecular weight cut-offs (MWCO) of 30, 50 and 150 kDa, respectively. Moreover, the effect of cross-flow velocity (CFV) was studied by performing the essays at different flow velocities of 3, 4 and 5 m/s. According to the obtained results, ceramic UF membranes proved to be a feasible pre-treatment alternative. Permeate flux increased as flow velocity was increased for most of the cases, owing to the fact that the cake layer formation was limited. Furthermore, flux decline along operating time was negligible for the higher flow velocities, whereas it was noticeable for the lowest How velocity tested. For the lowest MWCO analyzed. lower cross-flow velocities were needed in order to limit the cake layer formation and reach the steady-state. This implies that, although fouling was significant for all the three molecular weight cut-off studied, it was much more noticeable when MWCO was increased. Slightly better results in terms of permeate quality were achieved as MWCO was lower. In addition, higher chemical oxygen demand (COD) and conductivity retention coefficients were obtained for the lowest cross-flow velocity. Turbidity and color removals seemed to be more influenced by water composition than CFV, with rejections higher than 99% and between 84 and 98%, respectively. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.