Lessons Learned from the Water Producer Project in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil

被引:17
作者
Viani, Ricardo A. G. [1 ]
Bracale, Henrique [2 ]
Taffarello, Denise [3 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Sao Carlos UFSCar, Dept Biotechnol & Plant & Anim Prod, BR-13600970 Araras, SP, Brazil
[2] Nature Conservancy, BR-01311936 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Hydraul & Sanitat, EESC, SHS, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
来源
FORESTS | 2019年 / 10卷 / 11期
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
ecological restoration; landowner engagement; forest and landscape restoration; forest restoration; payment for ecosystem services; tropical forest; water; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; CANTAREIRA SYSTEM; RESTORATION; PAYMENTS; OPPORTUNITIES; CHALLENGES; HEADWATERS; PROGRAMS; SCHEMES;
D O I
10.3390/f10111031
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Forest and landscape restoration (FLR) is a powerful strategy for large-scale tropical forest recovery, and payment for ecosystem services (PES) is used to support FLR programs and projects on privately-owned land. In this article, we discuss the lessons learned from the Water Producer Project, a pioneer, multiple-stakeholder, and PES-supported FLR project in the Atlantic Forest, south-eastern Brazil. The project was implemented in four landscapes located in two municipalities. Altogether, 41 PES contracts with landowners were signed, resulting in various FLR practices being implemented in a total of 342.4 ha (64.2 ha for riparian forest restoration, 90.8 ha for soil conservation, and 187.4 for forest conservation) of land, which represents 39% of the project goal. As of the end of the project, only 50% (USD 49,250) of the available PES funds had been spent. However, funds spent on project planning, implementation, communication, and monitoring were 12 times greater than those spent on PES. Several challenges restricted the progress and monitoring of the project. The main issue was landowner participation and/or engagement. In terms of lessons learned, we highlight that PES schemes are more complex than initially thought, and that sufficient funding does not guarantee the success of FLR projects. It is essential to promote landowner participation and engagement by considering them key players in FLR projects. Finally, acceptance from landowners was higher and implementation was easier for forest conservation practices that required no land-use changes. Thus, we suggest that similar future projects should focus on targeting private properties in marginal agricultural lands with a high probability of natural regeneration. Alternatively, future projects could focus on lands with remnant forest cover of high conservation value.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PRODUTOR AGUA PCJ PA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, About ANA
  • [3] Analysing the impacts of PES programmes beyond economic rationale: Perceptions of ecosystem services provision associated to the Mexican case
    Arriagada, Rodrigo
    Villasenor, Adrian
    Rubiano, Eliana
    Cotacachi, David
    Morrison, Judith
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 29 : 116 - 127
  • [4] Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot
    Banks-Leite, Cristina
    Pardini, Renata
    Tambosi, Leandro R.
    Pearse, William D.
    Bueno, Adriana A.
    Bruscagin, Roberta T.
    Condez, Thais H.
    Dixo, Marianna
    Igari, Alexandre T.
    Martensen, Alexandre C.
    Metzger, Jean Paul
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2014, 345 (6200) : 1041 - 1045
  • [5] Benini R.M., 2017, Economia da Restauracao Florestal
  • [6] Brancalion P. H. S., 2013, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, V32, P728, DOI 10.1080/10549811.2013.817339
  • [7] Beyond hectares: four principles to guide reforestation in the context of tropical forest and landscape restoration
    Brancalion, Pedro H. S.
    Chazdon, Robin L.
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2017, 25 (04) : 491 - 496
  • [8] A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives
    Brancalion, Pedro H. S.
    Garcia, Letcia C.
    Loyola, Rafael
    Rodrigues, Ricardo R.
    Pillar, Valerio D.
    Lewinsohn, Thomas M.
    [J]. NATUREZA & CONSERVACAO, 2016, 14 : 1 - 15
  • [9] One size does not fit all: Natural infrastructure investments within the Latin American Water Funds Partnership
    Bremer, Leah L.
    Auerbach, Dan A.
    Goldstein, Joshua H.
    Vogl, Adrian L.
    Shemie, Daniel
    Kroeger, Timm
    Nelson, Joanna L.
    Benitez, Silvia P.
    Calvache, Alejandro
    Guimaraes, Joao
    Herron, Colin
    Higgins, Jonathan
    Klemz, Claudio
    Leon, Jorge
    Sebastian Lozano, Juan
    Moreno, Pedro H.
    Nunez, Francisco
    Veiga, Fernando
    Tiepolo, Gilberto
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 17 : 217 - 236
  • [10] A Policy-Driven Knowledge Agenda for Global Forest and Landscape Restoration
    Chazdon, Robin L.
    Brancalion, Pedro H. S.
    Lamb, David
    Laestadius, Lars
    Calmon, Miguel
    Kumar, Chetan
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (01): : 125 - 132