共 50 条
Who drives green innovations? Characteristics and policy implications for green building collaborative innovation networks in China
被引:79
作者:
Wang, Ge
[1
,2
,3
]
Li, Yang
[4
]
Zuo, Jian
[5
]
Hu, Wenbo
[1
]
Nie, Qingwei
[1
]
Lei, Heqian
[1
]
机构:
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Publ Adm, 1 Shizishan St, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Agr Univ, Rural Revitalizat Inst, 1 Shizishan St, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, 1954 Huashan Rd, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 1500 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Adelaide, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词:
Green building;
Innovative collaboration;
Social network analysis (SNA);
PROJECT-MANAGEMENT;
ECO-CITIES;
INDUSTRY;
ENERGY;
PERFORMANCE;
DIFFUSION;
ADOPTION;
TECHNOLOGIES;
INCENTIVES;
INDICATORS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.rser.2021.110875
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
The delivery of green buildings, as a good approach for reducing energy consumption, has yielded lots of innovative outcomes. The need to spark effective innovations has become crucial. Yet, there has been no systematic examination of the green buildings field. This study provides a novel network-based and longitudinal perspective for examining the innovative collaboration of different types of organizations. Secondary data were collected from 223 projects receiving Green Building Innovation Awards (GBIA) in China. By using the social network analysis (SNA) method, the following results were obtained. First, collaborative networks of greenbuilding innovation exhibit a salient feature of being scale-free, indicating a trend of path dependence in partner selections. Second, compared with the degree and closeness centrality, the betweenness centrality of those core organizations is growing faster over time. Unexpectedly, consulting enterprises, rather than design institutes or universities, are inclined to act as ?bridges? during the innovative collaboration process. Thirdly, the average number of collaborations per GBIA organization is similar to that of theoretical disciplines (e.g., mathematics) but lower than that of experimental disciplines (e.g., medicine). With decreases in transitivity over time, the heterogeneity of networks has increased and the connections among different organizations are relying more on a few key enterprises or institutions. On this basis, a policy framework is presented that incorporates four governance strategies: ?deactivation,? ?framing,? ?mobilizing,? and ?synthesizing.? The findings shed new light on the development of innovation networks and the alignment of strategic decision-makings to facilitate the transformation of energy consumption in the built environment.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文