Cone-beam computed tomographic imaging of central giant cell granuloma: A comprehensive review

被引:2
作者
Tahmasbi-Arashlow, Mehrnaz [1 ]
Patel, Paras B. [1 ]
Nair, Madhu K. [1 ]
Liang, Hui [1 ]
Cheng, Yi-Shing Lisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Diagnost Sci, Coll Dent, 3302 Gaston Ave, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
关键词
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Granuloma; Giant Cell; Treatment; Jaw; CENTRAL ODONTOGENIC FIBROMA; OSSIFYING FIBROMA; JAWS; LESIONS; FEATURES; BONE; MANAGEMENT; MUTATION; TUMORS; H3F3A;
D O I
10.5624/isd.20220130
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to characterize the cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging features of central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jawbone. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed 26 CBCT studies of histologically proven cases of CGCG during a period of 20 years, from 1999 to 2019. Patients' demographic data were recorded, and radiographic features were assessed (location, border, cortication, appearance of the internal structure, locularity, septation, expansion, cortical perforation, effects on surrounding tissue, whether the lesion crossed the midline, and lesion volume). Results: In this study, CGCGs were seen almost twice as often in the mandible than in the maxilla, and 64.7% of mandibular lesions involved the anterior region. Only 26.9% of lesions crossed the midline, a feature that was considered characteristic of CGCG. Furthermore, 65.4% of lesions were unilocular and 34.6% were multilocular. The correlation between a lesion's size and its locularity was statistically significant, and larger lesions showed a multilocular appearance. The mean volume of multilocular lesions was greater than that of unilocular lesions. Conclusion: CGCGs showed variable radiographic features on CBCT, and this imaging modality is highly effective at demonstrating the radiographic spectrum and lesional extent of CGCGs in the jawbone.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 131
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Radiographic Diagnosis of a Central Giant Cell Granuloma Using Advanced Imaging: Cone Beam Computed Tomography [J].
Abdelkarim, Ahmed Z. ;
Abu el Sadat, Shaimaa M. ;
Chmieliauskaite, Milda ;
Syed, Ali .
CUREUS, 2018, 10 (06)
[2]  
Abdelqader, 2018, J ORAL MED ORAL SURG, V24, P182
[3]  
ANDERSEN L, 1973, ACTA PATH MICRO IM A, VA 81, P606
[4]   A CLINICAL AND HISTOMORPHOLOGIC COMPARISON OF THE CENTRAL GIANT-CELL GRANULOMA AND THE GIANT-CELL TUMOR [J].
AUCLAIR, PL ;
CUENIN, P ;
KRATOCHVIL, FJ ;
SLATER, LJ ;
ELLIS, GL .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1988, 66 (02) :197-208
[5]  
BARNES L, 2005, WHO CLASSIFICATION T, P53
[6]  
Baskaran P, 2015, J Oral Maxillofac Radiol, V3, P88, DOI [10.4103/2321-3841.170614, DOI 10.4103/2321-3841.170614]
[7]   Calcifying odontogenic cyst associated with an orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst [J].
de Fátima Bernardes V. ;
de Lacerda J.C.T. ;
de Aguiar M.C.F. ;
Gomez R.S. .
Head and Neck Pathology, 2008, 2 (4) :324-327
[8]   Radiographic features of central giant cell granuloma of the jaws in children [J].
Bodner, L ;
BarZiv, J .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 1996, 26 (02) :148-151
[9]  
Bologna Molina R, 2011, J CLIN EXP DENT, V3, P348
[10]   Mutation Analysis of H3F3A and H3F3B as a Diagnostic Tool for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone and Chondroblastoma [J].
Cleven, Arjen H. G. ;
Hocker, Saskia ;
Briaire-de Bruijn, Inge ;
Szuhai, Karoly ;
Cleton-Jansen, Anne-Marie ;
Bovee, Judith V. M. G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 39 (11) :1576-1583