Modifying attitudes about modified foods: Increased knowledge leads to more positive attitudes

被引:63
作者
McPhetres, Jonathon [1 ]
Rutjens, Bastiaan T. [2 ]
Weinstein, Netta [3 ]
Brisson, Jennifer A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Clin & Social Sci Psychol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[4] Univ Rochester, Dept Biol, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
关键词
GMO; GM foods; Science education; Deficit model; Attitudes; GENETICALLY-MODIFIED FOODS; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; DEFICIT MODEL; SCIENCE; INFORMATION; EDUCATION; LITERACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Genetically modified (GM) foods are often met with harsh public opposition, though little research has attempted to understand why this is. The research that does exist has focused on identifying the role of immutable beliefs, such as morality and politics, which are difficult to change. Therefore, research may benefit from identifying mutable predictors of science rejection-predictors which can be modified through interventions-so efforts can be made to increase public support for scientific advancements. Here we present four studies in which we investigate a lack of domain-specific science literacy-literacy of GM technology-as a strong and unique predictor of GM food skepticism. Results from Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated that knowledge of GM technology is a unique predictor of GM food attitudes above general science knowledge and demographic controls. Study 3 (preregistered) demonstrates that the unique predictive value of GM-specific knowledge replicates in the US, the UK, and the Netherlands. In Study 4, we sought to overcome this lack of knowledge by teaching people the basic science behind GM technology using a five-week, longitudinal experimental design. Results showed that learning about the science behind GM technology leads to more positive explicit attitudes towards GM foods, greater willingness to eat GM products, and lowered perceptions of GM foods as risky. Thus, the present results provide some support for the deficit model of science attitudes within the context of GM foods. These results also provide a relatively simple mold for future interventions to overcome GM skepticism, suggesting that researchers and scientists may wish to focus on communicating the basic science behind GM technology and increasing science literacy.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 29
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [11] Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement
    Bastian, B
    Haslam, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 42 (02) : 228 - 235
  • [12] Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition
    Blancke, Stefaan
    Van Breusegem, Frank
    De Jaeger, Geert
    Braeckman, Johan
    Van Montagu, Mare
    [J]. TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2015, 20 (07) : 414 - 418
  • [13] Brossard D, 2010, NEW AGENDAS COMMUN, P11
  • [14] Bucchi Massimiano., 2008, HDB PUBLIC COMMUNICA, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203928240
  • [15] Cuite Cara L., 2005, International Journal of Biotechnology, V7, P178, DOI 10.1504/IJBT.2005.006453
  • [16] Genetic Essentialism: On the Deceptive Determinism of DNA
    Dar-Nimrod, Ilan
    Heine, Steven J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2011, 137 (05) : 800 - 818
  • [17] Devos Yann, 2006, Environmental Biosafety Research, V5, P127, DOI 10.1051/ebr:2007002
  • [18] Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics
    Drummond, Caitlin
    Fischhoff, Baruch
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (36) : 9587 - 9592
  • [19] Understanding the Process of Moralization: How Eating Meat Becomes a Moral Issue
    Feinberg, Matthew
    Kovacheff, Chloe
    Teper, Rimma
    Inbar, Yoel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 117 (01) : 50 - 72
  • [20] Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most
    Fernbach, Philip M.
    Light, Nicholas
    Scott, Sydney E.
    Inbar, Yoel
    Rozin, Paul
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 3 (03) : 251 - 256