Evaluating the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A meta-analysis of techno-economic analysis studies

被引:64
作者
Aui, A. [1 ]
Wang, Y. [2 ]
Mba-Wright, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Cellulosic ethanol; Economic feasibility; Minimum fuel selling price (MFSP); Economies of scale; Techno-economic analysis; Meta-analysis; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; THERMOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION; CORN STOVER; HYDROTHERMAL LIQUEFACTION; BIOFUELS PRODUCTION; PYROLYTIC SUGARS; PRODUCTION COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2021.111098
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The conversion of cellulosic biomass to ethanol as a viable way of decarbonizing the transportation sector has experienced a growing interest in the last few decades. However, this infant industry still struggles to succeed commercially. To examine the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol, this study conducts a meta-analysis using recently published Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) studies, which compute the Minimum Fuel Selling Price (MFSP) to measure the economic viability of ethanol production. This review finds that ethanol MFSPs range from $0.90-6.00/gallon with an average of $2.65/gallon, which is comparable to retail gasoline prices in the U.S. The considerable variation in MFSP estimates is due to the wide range of assumptions made by TEA studies. The unit cost of production was computed to examine the economies of scale effect, which resulted in a scale factor of 0.69. This estimate affirms the assumptions made by TEA studies. Multivariate linear regression shows that capital cost is positively correlated, while input capacity and output capacity are negatively correlated, with MFSP. These variables significantly impact MFSP, while pathway, feedstock type, and feedstock cost are not statistically significant due partly to data limitations. Findings from this analysis provide insights for improving the economic viability of cellulosic ethanol, which calls for a suite of government policies including financial incentives, mandates, and assistance programs for this industry to thrive.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 164 条
[81]   Separation, hydrolysis and fermentation of pyrolytic sugars to produce ethanol and lipids [J].
Lian, Jieni ;
Chen, Shulin ;
Zhou, Shuai ;
Wang, Zhouhong ;
O'Fallon, James ;
Li, Chun-Zhu ;
Garcia-Perez, Manuel .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (24) :9688-9699
[82]   Cellulosic ethanol production: Progress, challenges and strategies for solutions [J].
Liu, Chen-Guang ;
Xiao, Yi ;
Xia, Xiao-Xia ;
Zhao, Xin-Qing ;
Peng, Liangcai ;
Srinophakun, Penjit ;
Bai, Feng-Wu .
BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2019, 37 (03) :491-504
[83]  
Livingston D.R., 2011, Ethanolic Fermentation of Bio-oil Hydrolysate
[84]   Allocation issues in LCA methodology: a case study of corn stover-based fuel ethanol [J].
Luo, Lin ;
van der Voet, Ester ;
Huppes, Gjalt ;
de Haes, Helias A. Udo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2009, 14 (06) :529-539
[85]   Recent advances in the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for biofuels and value-added products [J].
Mahmood, Hamayoun ;
Moniruzzaman, Muhammad ;
Iqbal, Tanveer ;
Khan, Maria Jafar .
CURRENT OPINION IN GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY, 2019, 20 :18-24
[86]   Economic and Environmental Analysis of the Hydrothermal Liquefaction Process of Animal Byproducts [J].
Marcilla, Antonio F. ;
Labarta, Juan A. ;
Leon, Milagros ;
Garcia, Angela N. .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2019, 58 (51) :23238-23248
[87]   The Valley of Death as Context for Role Theory in Product Innovation [J].
Markham, Stephen K. ;
Ward, Stephen J. ;
Aiman-Smith, Lynda ;
Kingon, Angus I. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 27 (03) :402-417
[88]  
Marulanda V.A., 2019, ADV BIOPROCESS ALTER, P59, DOI [10.1016/B978, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-817941-3.00004-8]
[89]  
Mayer A, 2019, BIOFUELS UNCERTAINTI
[90]  
McAloon A, 2000, NRELTP58028893