Evaluating the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A meta-analysis of techno-economic analysis studies

被引:64
作者
Aui, A. [1 ]
Wang, Y. [2 ]
Mba-Wright, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Cellulosic ethanol; Economic feasibility; Minimum fuel selling price (MFSP); Economies of scale; Techno-economic analysis; Meta-analysis; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; THERMOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION; CORN STOVER; HYDROTHERMAL LIQUEFACTION; BIOFUELS PRODUCTION; PYROLYTIC SUGARS; PRODUCTION COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2021.111098
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The conversion of cellulosic biomass to ethanol as a viable way of decarbonizing the transportation sector has experienced a growing interest in the last few decades. However, this infant industry still struggles to succeed commercially. To examine the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol, this study conducts a meta-analysis using recently published Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) studies, which compute the Minimum Fuel Selling Price (MFSP) to measure the economic viability of ethanol production. This review finds that ethanol MFSPs range from $0.90-6.00/gallon with an average of $2.65/gallon, which is comparable to retail gasoline prices in the U.S. The considerable variation in MFSP estimates is due to the wide range of assumptions made by TEA studies. The unit cost of production was computed to examine the economies of scale effect, which resulted in a scale factor of 0.69. This estimate affirms the assumptions made by TEA studies. Multivariate linear regression shows that capital cost is positively correlated, while input capacity and output capacity are negatively correlated, with MFSP. These variables significantly impact MFSP, while pathway, feedstock type, and feedstock cost are not statistically significant due partly to data limitations. Findings from this analysis provide insights for improving the economic viability of cellulosic ethanol, which calls for a suite of government policies including financial incentives, mandates, and assistance programs for this industry to thrive.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 164 条
[1]  
Aden A, 2008, BIOCH PRODUCTION ETH
[2]  
Aden A., 2002, National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing cocurrent dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover, DOI 10.2172/15001119
[3]   Significance and Challenges of Biomass as a Suitable Feedstock for Bioenergy and Biochemical Production: A Review [J].
Ahorsu, Richard ;
Medina, Francesc ;
Constanti, Magda .
ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (12)
[4]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[5]   A review on process conditions for optimum bio-oil yield in hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass [J].
Akhtar, Javaid ;
Amin, Nor Aishah Saidina .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (03) :1615-1624
[6]  
[Anonymous], Weekly Retail Gasoline and Diesel Prices
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INCR FEEDST PROD BIO
[8]   Agro-industrial lignocellulosic biomass a key to unlock the future bio-energy: A brief review [J].
Anwar, Zahid ;
Gulfraz, Muhammad ;
Irshad, Muhammad .
JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2014, 7 (02) :163-173
[9]  
Balan Venkatesh, 2014, ISRN Biotechnol, V2014, P463074, DOI 10.1155/2014/463074
[10]   Techno-economic evaluation of stillage treatment with anaerobic digestion in a softwood-to-ethanol process [J].
Barta, Zsolt ;
Reczey, Kati ;
Zacchi, Guido .
BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2010, 3