The effect of prehabilitation on the range of motion and functional outcomes in patients following the total knee or hip arthroplasty: A pilot randomized trial

被引:30
作者
Cavill, Stuart [1 ]
McKenzie, Kylie [1 ]
Munro, Adrienne [2 ]
McKeever, Janice [3 ]
Whelan, Lucy [4 ]
Biggs, Luke [4 ]
Skinner, Elizabeth H. [5 ,6 ]
Haines, Terry P. [5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Monash Hlth, Monash Med Ctr, Dept Physiotherapy, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, Vic 3146, Australia
[2] Alfred Hosp, Dept Occupat Therapy, Prahran, Vic 3181, Australia
[3] Monash Hlth, Dandenong Hosp, Dept Occupat Therapy, Dandenong, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Hlth, Dept Physiotherapy, Community Rehabil, Cranbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Monash Hlth, Monash Med Ctr, Allied Hlth Res Unit, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[6] Western Hlth, Dept Physiotherapy, Sunshine Hosp, Sunshine, Vic, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Frankston, Vic, Australia
关键词
Activities of daily living; arthroplasty (replacement); range of motion (articular); rehabilitation; JOINT REPLACEMENT SURGERY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREOPERATIVE EXERCISE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; EUROQOL; EQ-5D; GO;
D O I
10.3109/09593985.2016.1138174
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: The study investigated the effect of prehabilitation on the quality of life and function in patients having total knee replacement (TKR)/total hip replacement (THR). Methods: A pilot randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Sixty-four people undergoing elective lower-limb arthroplasty were included. Prehabilitation included one-hour twice-weekly sessions for at least three and a maximum of four weeks prior to surgery. Control participants did not complete any pre-surgical programs. Health utility and quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-3L and the patient-specific functional scale were the primary outcomes measured before allocation and eight weeks post-operatively. Results: No between-group differences were evident in health utility (main effect of the group -0.04 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] -0.16 to 0.08, p = 0.50) or patient-specific functional scale (main effect of the group -0.59 (95% CI -1.8 to 0.6, p= 0.73), but the group-by-joint interaction effects for the timed up and go (TUG) (7.6 (95% CI -0.9 to 16.1, p = 0.08)) and the EQ-5D VAS (-18.3 (95% CI -41.1 to 4.5), p = 0.11) were larger. Prehabilitation participants' knee flexion improved by 12.6 degrees (95% CI 5.2-20, p= 0.001). Conclusions: Prehabilitation improved knee flexion, but this did not translate into improved functional mobility or quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 270
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Access Economics Proprietary Limited Company, 2007, PAINF REAL EC IMP AR
[2]   Decline in Health-Related Quality of Life reported by more than half of those waiting for joint replacement surgery: a prospective cohort study [J].
Ackerman, Ilana N. ;
Bennell, Kim L. ;
Osborne, Richard H. .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2011, 12
[3]   Does pre-operative physiotherapy improve outcomes from lower limb joint replacement surgery? A systematic review [J].
Ackerman, IN ;
Bennell, KL .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2004, 50 (01) :25-30
[4]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[5]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012, AUSTR HOSP STAT 2010
[6]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012, HOSP PERF WAIT TIM E
[7]   A comparison of the performance of the EQ-5D and SF-6D for individuals aged ≥ 45 years [J].
Barton, Garry R. ;
Sach, Tracey H. ;
Avery, Anthony J. ;
Jenkinson, Claire ;
Doherty, Michael ;
Whynes, David K. ;
Muir, Kenneth R. .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2008, 17 (07) :815-832
[8]  
Beaupre LA, 2004, J RHEUMATOL, V31, P1166
[9]   Why is there such a difference in outcome between Australian intensive care units and others? [J].
Bellomo, Rinaldo ;
Stow, Peter J. ;
Hart, Graeme K. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 20 (02) :100-105
[10]   Strategies for the prevention and management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee [J].
Bijlsma, J. W. J. ;
Knahr, K. .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 21 (01) :59-76