Panarchy and community resilience: Sustainability science and policy implications

被引:128
作者
Berkes, Fikret [1 ]
Ross, Helen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Nat Resources Inst, 70 Dysart Rd, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Resilience; Panarchy; Social-ecological systems; Drivers; Multi-level governance globalisation; SCALE; SYSTEMS; COMANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; POVERTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
How does the resilience concept of nested relationships (panarchy) contribute to sustainability science and policy? Resilience at a particular level of organization, the community level in our case, is influenced by internal processes at that level. But it is also impacted by actions at lower levels of organization (individuals, households), and by drivers of change originating at higher levels (national level policies, globalized market forces). We focus on community level social-ecological systems, looking upwards and downwards from there. Our objective is to explore the connections of the community to other levels, the ways in which community resilience is impacted, and the implications of this for sustainability. Conventional disciplines specialize at different levels, a barrier to investigating multi-level interactions. Use of the panarchy concept helps contribute to the interdisciplinary understanding of resilience at the community (and other levels) by drawing attention to cross-scale relationships. From the effect of individual leadership to the implication of pandemics that move swiftly across levels, examples illustrate a diversity of ways in which community resilience is shaped in a multi-level world. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 193
页数:9
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change [J].
Adger, W. Neil ;
Brown, Katrina ;
Nelson, Donald R. ;
Berkes, Fikret ;
Eakin, Hallie ;
Folke, Carl ;
Galvin, Kathleen ;
Gunderson, Lance ;
Goulden, Marisa ;
O'Brien, Karen ;
Ruitenbeek, Jack ;
Tompkins, Emma L. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2011, 2 (05) :757-766
[2]   Social and ecological resilience: are they related? [J].
Adger, WN .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (03) :347-364
[3]  
Ahl V., 1996, Hierarchy theory: a vision, vocabulary, and epistemology
[4]   Panarchy: Theory and Application [J].
Allen, Craig R. ;
Angeler, David G. ;
Garmestani, Ahjond S. ;
Gunderson, Lance H. ;
Holling, C. S. .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2014, 17 (04) :578-589
[5]   The fragility of robust social-ecological systems [J].
Anderies, John M. ;
Janssen, Marco A. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (04) :1153-1156
[6]   MORE IS DIFFERENT - BROKEN SYMMETRY AND NATURE OF HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE OF SCIENCE [J].
ANDERSON, PW .
SCIENCE, 1972, 177 (4047) :393-&
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ECOL SOC
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Navigating social-ecological systems building resilience for complexity and change
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world, DOI DOI 10.2174/
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ResilienceBased Natural Resource Management in a Changing World, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-73033-2