Talking Points: Women's Information Needs for Informed Decision-Making About Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome

被引:14
作者
Dane, Aimee C. [1 ,2 ]
Peterson, Madelyn [1 ]
Miller, Yvette D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Nat Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4069, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Queensland Ctr Mothers & Babies, Bldg 96,Hood St, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Publ Hlth & Social Work, Victoria Pk Rd, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
关键词
Decision-making; Prenatal screening; Informed consent; Down syndrome; Noninvasive prenatal testing; Noninvasive prenatal screening; Cell-free fetal DNA; cffDNA; Patient education; Patient knowledge; CHOICE; LABORATORIES; KNOWLEDGE; TRIAL; PART; AID;
D O I
10.1007/s10897-018-0250-8
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Adequate knowledge is a vital component of informed decision-making; however, we do not know what information women value when making decisions about noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). The current study aimed to identify women's information needs for decision-making about NIPT as a first-tier, non-contingent test with out-of-pocket expense and. in turn. inform best practice by specifying the information that should be prioritized when providing pre-test counseling to women in a time-limited scenario or space-limited decision support tool. We asked women (N = 242) in Australia to indicate the importance of knowing 24 information items when making a decision about NIPT and to choose two information items they would most value. Our fmdings suggest that women value having complete information when making decisions about NIPT. Information about the accuracy of NIPT and the pros and cons of NIPT compared to other screening and invasive tests were perceived to be most important. The findings of this study can be used to maximize the usefulness of time-limited discussions or space-limited decision support tools, but should not be routinely relied upon as a replacement for provision of full and tailored information when feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:1258 / 1264
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A qualitative investigation of the decision-making process of couples considering prenatal screening for Down syndrome
    Carroll, Fran E.
    Owen-Smith, Amanda
    Shaw, Alison
    Montgomery, Alan A.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2012, 32 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [22] "We're Going to Book This for You": Threats to Informed Decision-Making in the Down Syndrome Determination
    Sangster, Sarah L.
    Lawson, Karen L.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2024, 46 (01)
  • [23] Impact of an information booklet on satisfaction and decision-making about BRCA genetic testing
    Mancini, Julien
    Nogues, Catherine
    Adenis, Claude
    Berthet, Pascaline
    Bonadona, Valerie
    Chompret, Agnes
    Coupier, Isabelle
    Eisinger, Francois
    Fricker, Jean-Pierre
    Gauthier-Villars, Marion
    Lasse, Christine
    Lortholary, Alain
    N'Guyen, Tan Dat
    Vennin, Philippe
    Sobol, Hagay
    Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique
    Julian-Reynier, Claire
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (07) : 871 - 881
  • [24] The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial
    Beulen, Lean
    van den Berg, Michelle
    Faas, Brigitte H. W.
    Feenstra, Ilse
    Hageman, Michiel
    van Vugt, John M. G.
    Bekker, Mireille N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2016, 24 (10) : 1409 - 1416
  • [25] Improving women’s knowledge about prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome – development and acceptability of a low literacy decision aid
    Sian Karen Smith
    Antonia Cai
    Michelle Wong
    Mariana S. Sousa
    Michelle Peate
    Alec Welsh
    Bettina Meiser
    Rajneesh Kaur
    Jane Halliday
    Sharon Lewis
    Lyndal Trevena
    Tatiane Yanes
    Kristine Barlow-Stewart
    Margot Barclay
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18
  • [26] The Needs of Dutch Women During Decision-Making About Treatment for Miscarriage
    Bussink-Legters, Anja G.
    van den Hoogen, Agnes
    Veersema, Sebastiaan
    Meijer, Wouter J.
    Ockhuijsen, Henrietta D. L.
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2021, 50 (04): : 439 - 449
  • [27] Decision-making about non-invasive prenatal testing: women's moral reasoning in the absence of a risk of miscarriage in Germany
    Reinsch, Stefan
    Konig, Anika
    Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph
    NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2021, 40 (02) : 199 - 215
  • [28] Women's experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research
    Yuill, Cassandra
    McCourt, Christine
    Cheyne, Helen
    Leister, Nathalie
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [29] Effects of different information brochures on women's decision-making regarding mammography screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled questionnaire study
    Gummersbach, Elisabeth
    in der Schmitten, Juergen
    Abholz, Heinz-Harald
    Wegscheider, Karl
    Pentzek, Michael
    TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [30] Uptake of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Chinese Women following Positive Down Syndrome Screening
    Poon, C. F.
    Tse, W. C.
    Kou, K. O.
    Leung, K. Y.
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2015, 37 (02) : 141 - 147