Subcutaneous Redon drains do not reduce the incidence of surgical site infections after laparotomy. A randomized controlled trial on 200 patients

被引:44
作者
Baier, Peter K. [1 ,5 ]
Glueck, Nadine C. [4 ]
Baumgartner, Ulrich [3 ]
Adam, Ulrich [2 ]
Fischer, Andreas [5 ]
Hopt, Ulrich T. [5 ]
机构
[1] Chirurg Univ Klin Freiburg, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Vivantes Humboldt Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
[3] Kreiskliniken Ottobeuren, Ottobeuren, Germany
[4] St Josefs Hosp, Freiburg, Germany
[5] Univ Freiburg, Dept Gen & Visceral Surg, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Surgical site infection; Laparotomy; Subcutaneous drain; Risk factors; CLINICAL-TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-010-0884-y
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Surgical site infections (SSI) cause excess morbidity and mortality in modern surgery. Several different approaches to reduce the incidence of SSI have been investigated with variable results. This is to our knowledge the first systematic randomized evaluation in patients undergoing laparotomy in visceral surgery to clarify whether widely used subcutaneous drains (Redon) affect wound infection as the primary outcome measure. In 200 patients, we were unable to show a statistically significant impact on the postoperative healing process in patients with the full variety of abdominal surgical interventions. Overall, we observed surgical site infection in 9.5% of all patients (n = 19), of these n = 9 (47.4%) were in the control group without a drain, and 10 (52.6%) were in the experimental group with a Redon drain (not significant). As this study could not demonstrate a reduction of SSI by the use of Redon drains, there is no indication for prophylactic subcutaneous suction drains after laparotomy.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 643
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Graf J, 1983, Unfallchirurgie, V9, P223
  • [2] Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy
    Kearns, SR
    Connolly, EM
    McNally, S
    McNamara, DA
    Deasy, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (01) : 41 - 44
  • [3] Subcutaneous stitch closure versus subcutaneous drain to prevent wound disruption after cesarean delivery: A randomized clinical trial
    Magann, EF
    Chauhan, SP
    Rodts-Palenik, S
    Bufkin, L
    Martin, JN
    Morrison, JC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) : 1119 - 1123
  • [4] Mangram A.J., 1999, Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection
  • [5] Subcutaneous drainage versus no drainage after minilaparotomy in gynecologic benign conditions: A randomized study
    Panici, PB
    Zullo, MA
    Casalino, B
    Angioli, R
    Muzii, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 71 - 75
  • [6] Peiper C, 1997, CHIRURG, V68, P63, DOI 10.1007/s001040050151
  • [7] A BACTERIOLOGIC STUDY COMPARING CLOSED SUCTION AND SIMPLE CONDUIT DRAINAGE
    RAVES, JJ
    SLIFKIN, M
    DIAMOND, DL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1984, 148 (05) : 618 - 620
  • [8] REDON H, 1954, Mem Acad Chir (Paris), V80, P394
  • [9] Laparoscope use and surgical site infections in digestive surgery
    Romy, Sebastien
    Eisenring, Marie-Christine
    Bettschart, Vincent
    Petignat, Christiane
    Francioli, Patrick
    Troillet, Nicolas
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (04) : 627 - 632
  • [10] A prospective, randomised, controlled trial of the use of drains in total hip arthroplasty
    Walmsley, PJ
    Kelly, MB
    Hill, RMF
    Brenkel, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (10): : 1397 - 1401