Blast mitigation using sandwich panels with saffil foam

被引:3
作者
Shirbhate, Payal A. [1 ]
Goel, M. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Visvesvaraya Natl Inst Technol, Dept Appl Mech, Nagpur 440010, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Sandwich panel; Blast; Saffil foam; Mitigation; LS-DYNA; THERMAL PROTECTION SYSTEM; DYNAMIC-RESPONSE; ALUMINUM; OPTIMIZATION; PLATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.786
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The demand for the protection of important government and public buildings has increased in recent days to resist blast loads due to frequent terrorist activities occurring around the world. Sandwich panels are preferred structural elements that can be used to protect the parent structure by mitigating the blast pressure. Numerical analysis of sandwich panel consisting of steel plates of equal thicknesses separated by a saffil foam core is carried out to evaluate its response under blast load. Parametric analysis of sandwich panels with varying foam thicknesses and standoff distance is performed using LS-DYNA?. The steel face and back-sheets in sandwich panels are modelled using piecewise linear plasticity material model and saffil foam is modelled using crushable foam material model available in LS-DYNA?. Moreover, back sheet of sandwich panels is stiffened using six different stiffener configurations. Finally, behaviour of conventional sandwich foam panel is compared with the stiffened sandwich foam panels for the considered stiffener configurations. Response of these different configurations of sandwich panels is evaluated based on peak central point displacement at the back sheet of the panel and it is observed that provision of stiffeners considerably improves the blast mitigation capacity of the sandwich panel. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Materials, Processing & Characterization.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 854
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, LS-Dyna Theory Manual
[2]  
Cai S., 2019, STRUCT MAT, P1
[3]   Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading [J].
Dharmasena, Kumar P. ;
Wadley, Haydn N. G. ;
Xue, Zhenyu ;
Hutchinson, John W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2008, 35 (09) :1063-1074
[4]   Blast Resistance of Stiffened Sandwich Panels with Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam [J].
Goel, Manmohan Dass ;
Matsagar, Vasant A. ;
Gupta, Anil K. .
LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2014, 11 (13) :2497-2515
[5]   Comparative Performance of Stiffened Sandwich Foam Panels under Impulsive Loading [J].
Goel, Manmohan Dass ;
Matsagar, Vasant A. ;
Marburg, Steffen ;
Gupta, Anil K. .
JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2013, 27 (05) :540-549
[6]   Dynamic Response of Stiffened Plates under Air Blast [J].
Goel, Manmohan Dass ;
Matsagar, Vasant A. ;
Gupta, Anil K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE STRUCTURES, 2011, 2 (01) :139-155
[7]   Comparison of Materials for an Integrated Thermal Protection System for Spacecraft Reentry [J].
Gogu, Christian ;
Bapanapalli, Satish K. ;
Haftka, Raphael T. ;
Sankar, Bhavani V. .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2009, 46 (03) :501-513
[8]   Blast resistance and energy absorption of sandwich panels with layered gradient metallic foam cores [J].
Jing, Lin ;
Zhao, Longmao .
JOURNAL OF SANDWICH STRUCTURES & MATERIALS, 2019, 21 (02) :464-482
[9]  
Kingery C.N., 1984, ARBRLTR02555CRC US A
[10]   Perforated plates as passive mitigation systems [J].
Langdon, G. S. ;
Nurick, G. N. ;
Balden, V. H. ;
Tirrimis, R. B. .
DEFENCE SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2008, 58 (02) :238-247