The Dutch elderly's preferences toward a smart demand-responsive transport service

被引:43
作者
Jittrapirom, Peraphan [1 ,2 ]
van Neerven, Wouter [1 ]
Martens, Karel [1 ,3 ]
Trampe, Debra [4 ]
Meurs, Henk [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Sch Management, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Architecture & Town Planning, Haifa, Israel
[4] HAN Univ Appl Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Transport policy; DRT; Smart mobility; Ageing; Breng flex; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; MOBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100383
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The ageing of the population poses mobility-related challenges worldwide. The emergence of new transport services that utilise technological innovations allows for new, more convenient ways to provide demand-responsive transport services in areas with limited or no regular public transport service. The question is how the features of these new services are preferred by all age groups, in particular, those with limited mobility, such as the elderly. In this study, we evaluate the preference of the elderly toward Breng flex, a smart Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) service offered in two adjacent Dutch cities and their surroundings. We combine results from expert interviews (n = 4), a face-to-face survey with elderly non-users of Breng flex (n = 38), and an online survey of Breng flex users of all ages (n = 958). The results illustrate fourteen features of smart forms of DRT that are preferred by the elderly, three of which are identified here for the first time. We discuss the trade-off between various features for the case study area and make suggestions regarding the design of a mobility service that can improve accessibility of the elderly.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]   Uber for Seniors? Exploring Transportation Options for the Future [J].
Leistner, Deborah L. ;
Steiner, Ruth L. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2017, (2660) :22-29
[22]  
Li H., 2012, Research in Transportation Economics, V34, P39, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.RETREC.2011.12.007, 10.1016/j.retrec.2011.12.007]
[23]  
Lunden I., 2016, SAYS 20 ITS RIDES GL
[24]  
Mageean J., 2003, J. Transp. Geogr, V11, P255, DOI [10.1016/S0966-6923(03)00026-7, DOI 10.1016/S0966-6923(03)00026-7]
[25]  
MARTENS HD, 2016, EULENWELT, P1
[26]   Ageing, impairments and travel: Priority setting for an inclusive transport system [J].
Martens, Karel .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2018, 63 :122-130
[27]   Outdoor mobility and social relationships of elderly people [J].
Mollenkopf, H ;
Marcellini, F ;
Ruoppila, I ;
Flaschentrager, P ;
Gagliardi, C ;
Spazzafumo, L .
ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 1997, 24 (03) :295-310
[28]   Mode use and trip length of seniors in Montreal [J].
Moniruzzaman, Md ;
Paez, Antonio ;
Habib, Khandker M. Nurul ;
Morency, Catherine .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 30 :89-99
[29]  
Municipality of Nijmegen, 2018, BUS 65
[30]   Transportation alternative preferences of the aging population [J].
Rahman, Md Mahmudur ;
Strawderman, Lesley ;
Adams-Price, Carolyn ;
Turner, Joshua J. .
TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND SOCIETY, 2016, 4 :22-28