Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance

被引:817
作者
Refsgaard, Jens Christian [1 ]
van der Sluijs, Jeroen P.
Hojberg, Anker Lajer
Vanrolleghem, Peter A.
机构
[1] Geol Survey Denmark & Greenland, GEUS, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev & Innovat, Dept Sci Technol & Soc, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Ghent, BIOMATH, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Univ Laval, Water Qual Modelling Model EAU, Laval, PQ, Canada
关键词
integrated water resources management; water framework directive; catchment modelling; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.02.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A terminology and typology of uncertainty is presented together with a framework for the modelling process, its interaction with the broader water management process and the role of uncertainty at different stages in the modelling processes. Brief reviews have been made of 14 different (partly complementary) methods commonly used in uncertainty assessment and characterisation: data uncertainty engine (DUE), error propagation equations, expert elicitation, extended peer review, inverse modelling (parameter estimation), inverse modelling (predictive uncertainty), Monte Carlo analysis, multiple model simulation, NUSAP, quality assurance, scenario analysis, sensitivity analysis, stakeholder involvement and uncertainty matrix. The applicability of these methods has been mapped according to purpose of application, stage of the modelling process and source and type of uncertainty addressed. It is concluded that uncertainty assessment is not just something to be added after the completion of the modelling work. Instead uncertainty should be seen as a red thread throughout the modelling study starting from the very beginning, where the identification and characterisation of all uncertainty sources should be performed jointly by the modeller, the water manager and the stakeholders. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1543 / 1556
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Alcamo J., 2001, EUROPEAN ENV AGENCY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, SCI PUBL POLICY, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154303781780434
[3]  
[Anonymous], 4 TAC GWP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, EPA630R97001 USEPA
[5]   WATER-QUALITY MODELING - A REVIEW OF THE ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTY [J].
BECK, MB .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1987, 23 (08) :1393-1442
[6]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[7]   Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment [J].
Beven, K .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2002, 458 (2026) :2465-2484
[8]   An integrated methodology for recording uncertainties about environmental data [J].
Brown, JD ;
Heuvelink, GBM ;
Refsgaard, JC .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 52 (06) :153-160
[9]   Knowledge, uncertainty and physical geography: towards the development of methodologies for questioning belief [J].
Brown, JD .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 2004, 29 (03) :367-381
[10]   An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation [J].
Butts, MB ;
Payne, JT ;
Kristensen, M ;
Madsen, H .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 298 (1-4) :242-266