Comparison Between the 24-hour Hotter Test and 72-hour Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Monitoring With an Adhesive Patch-Type Device for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Prospective Cohort Study

被引:16
作者
Kwon, Soonil [1 ]
Lee, So-Ryoung [1 ]
Choi, Eue-Keun [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Hyo-Jeong [1 ]
Song, Hee-Seok [3 ]
Lee, Young-Shin [3 ]
Oh, Seil [1 ,2 ]
Lip, Gregory Y. H. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seers Technol Co, Seongnam Si, South Korea
[4] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool Ctr Cardiovasc Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[5] Aalborg Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
atrial fibrillation; diagnosis; electrocardiogram; wearable device; health monitoring; Holier; cardiac; arrhythmia; ECG; EKG; digital tool; cardiology; patient monitoring; outpatient clinic; cardiac health; diagnostic; patient; clinician; digital health;
D O I
10.2196/37970
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is insufficient evidence for the use of single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring with an adhesive patch-type device (APD) over an extended period compared to that of the 24-hour Holter test for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection. Objective: In this paper, we aimed to compare AF detection by the 24-hour Holter test and 72-hour single-lead ECG monitoring using an APD among patients with AF. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center cohort study. A total of 210 patients with AF with clinical indications for the Holter test at cardiology outpatient clinics were enrolled in the study. The study participants were equipped with both the Holter device and APD for the first 24 hours. Subsequently, only the APD continued ECG monitoring for an additional 48 hours. AF detection during the first 24 hours was compared between the two devices. The diagnostic benefits of extended monitoring using the APD were evaluated. Results: A total of 200 patients (mean age 60 years; n=141, 70.5% male; and n=59, 29.5% female) completed 72-hour ECG monitoring with the APD. During the first 24 hours, both monitoring methods detected AF in the same 40/200 (20%) patients (including 20 patients each with paroxysmal and persistent AF). Compared to the 24-hour Holier test, the APD increased the AF detection rate by 1.5-fold (58/200; 29%) and 1.6-fold (64/200; 32%) with 48- and 72-hour monitoring, respectively. With the APD, the number of newly discovered patients with paroxysmal AF was 20/44 (45.5%), 18/44 (40.9%), and 6/44 (13.6%) at 24-, 48-, and 72-hour monitoring, respectively. Compared with 24-hour Holier monitoring, 72-hour monitoring with the APD increased the detection rate of paroxysmal AF by 2.2-fold (44/20). Conclusions: Compared to the 24-hour Holter test, AF detection could be improved with 72-hour single-lead ECG monitoring with the APD.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Portable out-of-hospital electrocardiography: A review of current technologies
    Bansal, Agam
    Joshi, Rajnish
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2018, 34 (02) : 129 - 138
  • [2] Comparison of 24-hour Holter Monitoring with 14-day Novel Adhesive Patch Electrocardiographic Monitoring
    Barrett, Paddy M.
    Komatireddy, Ravi
    Haaser, Sharon
    Topol, Sarah
    Sheard, Judith
    Encinas, Jackie
    Fought, Angela J.
    Topol, Eric J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 127 (01) : 95.e11 - 95.e17
  • [3] Accuracy of mHealth Devices for Atrial Fibrillation Screening: Systematic Review
    Giebel, Godwin Denk
    Gissel, Christian
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2019, 7 (06):
  • [4] Association of Burden of Atrial Fibrillation With Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Adults With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation The KP-RHYTHM Study
    Go, Alan S.
    Reynolds, Kristi
    Yang, Jingrong
    Gupta, Nigel
    Lenane, Judith
    Sung, Sue Hee
    Harrison, Teresa N.
    Liu, Taylor I.
    Solomon, Matthew D.
    [J]. JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 3 (07) : 601 - 608
  • [5] Yield and consistency of arrhythmia detection with patch electrocardiographic monitoring: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
    Heckbert, Susan R.
    Austin, Thomas R.
    Jensen, Paul N.
    Floyd, James S.
    Psaty, Bruce M.
    Soliman, Elsayed Z.
    Kronmal, Richard A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2018, 51 (06) : 997 - 1002
  • [7] The quality of ECG data acquisition, and diagnostic performance of a novel adhesive patch for ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring in arrhythmia detection
    Karaoguz, M. Remzi
    Yurtseven, Ece
    Asian, Gamze
    Deliormanli, Bilgen Gulsen
    Adiguzel, Omer
    Gonen, Mehmet
    Li, Ko-Mai
    Yilmaz, Elif Nur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2019, 54 : 28 - 35
  • [8] Validation of Adhesive Single-Lead ECG Device Compared with Holter Monitoring among Non-Atrial Fibrillation Patients
    Kwon, Soonil
    Lee, So-Ryoung
    Choi, Eue-Keun
    Ahn, Hyo-Jeong
    Song, Hee-Seok
    Lee, Young-Shin
    Oh, Seil
    [J]. SENSORS, 2021, 21 (09)
  • [9] Enhanced detection of cardiac arrhythmias utilizing 14-day continuous ECG patch monitoring
    Liu, Chih-Min
    Chang, Shih-Lin
    Yeh, Yung-Hsin
    Chung, Fa-Po
    Hu, Yu-Feng
    Chou, Chung-Chuan
    Hung, Kuo-Chun
    Chang, Po-Cheng
    Liao, Jo-Nan
    Chan, Yi-Hsin
    Lo, Li-Wei
    Wu, Lung-Sheng
    Lin, Yenn-Jiang
    Wen, Ming-Shien
    Chen, Shih-Ann
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 332 : 78 - 84
  • [10] Validation of a novel single lead ambulatory ECG monitor - Cardiostat™ - Compared to a standard ECG Holter monitoring
    Nault, Isabelle
    Andre, Philippe
    Plourde, Benoit
    Leclerc, Francois
    Sarrazin, Jean-Francois
    Philippon, Francois
    O'Hara, Gilles
    Molin, Franck
    Steinberg, Christian
    Roy, Karine
    Blier, Louis
    Champagne, Jean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2019, 53 : 57 - 63