Effects of Different Cell-Detaching Methods on the Viability and Cell Surface Antigen Expression of Synovial Mesenchymal Stem Cells

被引:117
|
作者
Tsuji, Kunikazu [1 ]
Ojima, Miyoko [2 ]
Otabe, Koji [3 ]
Horie, Masafumi [3 ]
Koga, Hideyuki [2 ]
Sekiya, Ichiro [3 ]
Muneta, Takeshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Cartilage Regenerat, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Joint Surg & Sports Med, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Ctr Stem Cell & Regenerat Med, Tokyo, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs); Surface antigen; Cell-detaching method; Viability; Multipotency; PROMOTE MENISCUS REGENERATION; DEFECT MODEL; CARTILAGE REGENERATION; STROMAL CELLS; IN-VITRO; COLLAGEN; TRANSPLANTATION; MACROMOLECULES; SUBPOPULATION; TRYPSIN;
D O I
10.3727/096368917X694831
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Flow cytometric analysis of cell surface antigens is a powerful tool for the isolation and characterization of stem cells residing in adult tissues. In contrast to the collection of hematopoietic stem cells, the process of enzymatic digestion is usually necessary to prepare mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) suspensions, which can influence the expression of cell surface markers. In this study, we examined the effects of various cell-detaching reagents and digestion times on the expression of stem cell-related surface antigens and MSC functions. Human MSCs were detached from dishes using four different reagents: trypsin, TrypLE, collagenase, and a non enzymatic cell dissociation reagent (C5789; Sigma-Aldrich). Following dissociation reagent incubations ranging from 5 to 120 min, cell surface markers were analyzed by flow cytometry. Trypsin and TrypLE quickly dissociated the cells within 5 min, while collagenase and C5789 required 60 min to obtain maximum cell yields. C5789 significantly decreased cell viability at 120 min. Trypsin treatment significantly reduced CD44(+), CD55(+), CD73(+), CD105(+), CD140a(+), CD140b(+), and CD201(+) cell numbers within 30 min. Collagenase treatment reduced CD140a expression by 30 min. In contrast, TrypLE treatment did not affect the expression of any cell surface antigens tested by 30 min. Despite the significant loss of surface antigen expression after 60 min of treatment with trypsin, adverse effects of enzymatic digestion on multipotency of MSCs were limited. Overall, our data indicated that TrypLE is advantageous over other cell dissociation reagents tested for the rapid preparation of viable MSC suspensions.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1102
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Effect of Cell Concentrations from Different Cell Populations on the Viability of Umbilical Blood Stem Cells
    Hauck-Dlimi, Barbara
    Dlimi, Afif
    Zimmermann, Robert
    Eckstein, Reinhold
    Zingsem, Juergen
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2014, 60 (10) : 1635 - 1640
  • [22] Nonadherent culture method downregulates stem cell antigen-1 expression in mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
    Deng, Baoping
    Deng, Weiping
    Xiao, Pingnan
    Zeng, Kuan
    Zhang, Shining
    Zhang, Hongwu
    Deng, David Y. B.
    Yang, Yanqi
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2015, 10 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [23] Cell transplantation: Differential effects of myoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells
    Guarita-Souza, L. C.
    Carvalho, K. A. T.
    Rebelatto, C.
    Senegaglia, A.
    Hansen, P.
    Furuta, M.
    Miyague, N.
    Francisco, J. C.
    Olandoski, M.
    Faria-Neto, J. R.
    Oliveira, S. A.
    Brofman, P. R. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 111 (03) : 423 - 429
  • [24] Integration of mesenchymal stem cells into islet cell spheroids improves long-term viability, but not islet function
    Rawal, Sonia
    Williams, S. Janette
    Ramachandran, Karthik
    Stehno-Bittel, Lisa
    ISLETS, 2017, 9 (05) : 87 - 98
  • [25] Cell Viability and Chondrogenic Differentiation Capability of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells After Iron Labeling with Iron Sucrose
    Papadimitriou, Nikolaos
    Thorfve, Anna
    Brantsing, Camilla
    Junevik, Katarina
    Baranto, Adad
    Henriksson, Helena Barreto
    STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 23 (21) : 2568 - 2580
  • [26] Alveolar Type II Cells or Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Comparison of Two Different Cell Therapies for the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury in Rats
    Guillamat-Prats, Raquel
    Camprubi-Rimblas, Marta
    Puig, Ferranda
    Herrero, Raquel
    Tantiny, Neus
    Serrano-Mollar, Anna
    Artigas, Antonio
    CELLS, 2020, 9 (08) : 1 - 15
  • [27] The biology of equine mesenchymal stem cells: phenotypic characterization, cell surface markers and multilineage differentiation
    Penny, Jasmine
    Harris, Pat
    Shakesheff, Kevin
    Mobasheri, Ali
    FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK, 2012, 17 : 892 - 908
  • [28] Next Generation Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC)-Based Cartilage Repair Using Scaffold-Free Tissue Engineered Constructs Generated with Synovial Mesenchymal Stem Cells
    Shimomura, Kazunori
    Ando, Wataru
    Moriguchi, Yu
    Sugita, Norihiko
    Yasui, Yukihiko
    Koizumi, Kota
    Fujie, Hiromichi
    Hart, David A.
    Yoshikawa, Hideki
    Nakamura, Norimasa
    CARTILAGE, 2015, 6 (02) : 13S - 29S
  • [29] EFFECTS OF MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION INTO ISCHEMIC BILE DUCT INJURY TISSUES OF RATS ON THE EXPRESSION OF VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL CELL PHENOTYPE AND THE INCREASE OF VASCULAR DENSITY
    Jiang, Weihua
    Lu, Li
    SLOVENIAN VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2019, 56 (04) : 183 - 190
  • [30] Cell-Surface Expression of Neuron-Glial Antigen 2 (NG2) and Melanoma Cell Adhesion Molecule (CD146) in Heterogeneous Cultures of Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
    Russell, Katie C.
    Tucker, H. Alan
    Bunnell, Bruce A.
    Andreeff, Michael
    Schober, Wendy
    Gaynor, Andrew S.
    Strickler, Karen L.
    Lin, Shuwen
    Lacey, Michelle R.
    O'Connor, Kim C.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2013, 19 (19-20) : 2253 - 2266