Interspecies Comparison of Mucosal Wave Properties Using High-Speed Digital Imaging

被引:28
作者
Regner, Michael F. [1 ]
Robitaille, Mark J. [1 ]
Jiang, Jack J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Surg, Div Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
High-speed digital imaging; vocal fold vibration; mucosal wave; interspecies; excised larynx; human endoscopy; COW LARYNGES; EXCISED PIG; SHEEP; VIBRATION; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.1002/lary.20884
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the vocal fold vibratory characteristics of ex vivo bovine, canine, ovine, and porcine larynges to human male and female vocal fold vibrations to determine the best model organism for laryngeal studies concerning vibratory and kinetic characteristics. Study Design: Prospective experimental. Methods: High-speed videos of phonation were gathered at 4,000 frames per second (fps) in the animal models and human high-speed endoscopy data were gathered at 2,000 fps. Videos were converted into kymograms, and the amplitude, oscillation frequency, and phase difference of vocal fold vibration were measured. Results: No statistically significant differences were found with respect to frequency, amplitude, or phase difference between canines and humans. Poreines were not significantly different from human females but did have an oscillation frequency significantly different from human males. Ovine vibrational amplitudes were significantly different from humans, and bovine frequency and amplitude differed significantly from humans. Conclusions: Canine and porcine larynges are the most appropriate model specimens for laryngeal studies contingent on vibratory or kinetic properties of phonation.
引用
收藏
页码:1188 / 1194
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Glottal Airflow Resistance in Excised Pig, Sheep, and Cow Larynges [J].
Alipour, Fariborz ;
Jaiswal, Sanyukta .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2009, 23 (01) :40-50
[2]   Phonatory characteristics of excised pig, sheep, and cow larynges [J].
Alipoura, Fariborz ;
Jaiswal, Sanyukta .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 123 (06) :4572-4581
[3]   The laryngeal dissection laboratory [J].
Effat, KG .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2005, 119 (12) :981-984
[4]   Comparative histology and vibration of the vocal folds: Implications for experimental studies in microlaryngeal surgery [J].
Garrett, CG ;
Coleman, JR ;
Reinisch, L .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2000, 110 (05) :814-824
[5]   A preclinical model for laryngeal transplantation: Anatomy and mucosal immunology of the porcine larynx [J].
Gorti, GK ;
Birchall, MA ;
Haverson, K ;
Macchiarini, P ;
Bailey, M .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (11) :1638-1642
[6]   COMPARATIVE HISTOCHEMISTRY OF HUMAN AND SHEEP LARYNGEAL MUSCLES [J].
HAPPAK, W ;
ZRUNEK, M ;
PECHMANN, U ;
STREINZER, W .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1989, 107 (3-4) :283-288
[7]   MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE OF VOCAL CORD AS A VIBRATOR AND ITS VARIATIONS [J].
HIRANO, M .
FOLIA PHONIATRICA, 1974, 26 (02) :89-94
[8]   Quantitative measurement of mucosal wave by high-speed photography in excised larynges [J].
Jiang, JJ ;
Yumoto, E ;
Lin, SJ ;
Kadota, Y ;
Kurokawa, H ;
Hanson, DG .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1998, 107 (02) :98-103
[9]   Comparison of the phonation-related structures among pig, dog, white-tailed deer, and human larynges [J].
Jiang, JJ ;
Raviv, JR ;
Hanson, DG .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2001, 110 (12) :1120-1125
[10]  
Kakita Y., 1981, Vocal Fold Physiology, P377