As it is known, there is scientific consensus on the existence of environmental issues which can potentially compromise the future of our societies. In order to resolve them, a substantial change in nature and society relations is required. The environmental political theory addressed this necessity. Nevertheless, its normative reflections did not influence institutions and social practices. This paper compares two proposed ways to engage environmental theory and practice. Taking the Anthropocene as its analysis framework, it claims an active role for political theory as a provider of concepts and arguments in the institutional and public spheres. I will defend this point in two ways. Firstly, I contend that political theory can engage with public debates while conserving its core logic and epistemologic standards. Secondly, I demonstrate others actors deficiencies, proposed to play that role. More concretely, I will provide a critical view of the environmental and climate justice movements.
机构:
Tufts Univ, Dept Econ, Medford, MA 02155 USA
Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC 20036 USA
NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USATufts Univ, Dept Econ, Medford, MA 02155 USA
机构:
Sofia Univ St Kliment Ohridski, Fac Class & Modern Philol, Dept Spanish & Portuguese Studies, 15 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, Sofia 1504, BulgariaSofia Univ St Kliment Ohridski, Fac Class & Modern Philol, Dept Spanish & Portuguese Studies, 15 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, Sofia 1504, Bulgaria
机构:
Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Polit Sci, La Jolla, CA USA
Social Sci Bldg 301,9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USAUniv Calif San Diego, Dept Polit Sci, La Jolla, CA USA
Ingham, Sean
Wiens, David
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Polit Sci, La Jolla, CA USAUniv Calif San Diego, Dept Polit Sci, La Jolla, CA USA
机构:
Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Univ British Columbia, Fac Educ, Okanagan Sch Educ, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, CanadaUniv British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada