Biogas Upgrading: A Review of National Biomethane Strategies and Support Policies in Selected Countries

被引:35
作者
Schmid, Christopher [1 ]
Horschig, Thomas [1 ]
Pfeiffer, Alexandra [1 ]
Szarka, Nora [1 ]
Thraen, Daniela [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] DBFZ Deutsch Biomasseforschungszentrum gGmbH, Torgauer Str 116, D-04347 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, UFZ, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Leipzig, Chair Bioenergysyst, Grimmaische Str 12, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
cross-country comparison; biomethane policies; renewable natural gas; biogas upgrading; biomethane market; RENEWABLE ENERGY; PARIS AGREEMENT; BIOMASS; GAS; TECHNOLOGIES; EMISSIONS; GERMANY; INSTRUMENTS; TRANSPORT; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.3390/en12193803
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Bioenergy contributes significantly towards the share of renewable energies, in Europe and worldwide. Besides solid and liquid biofuels, gaseous biofuels, such as biogas or upgraded biogas (biomethane), are an established renewable fuel in Europe. Although many studies consider biomethane technologies, feedstock potentials, or sustainability issues, the literature on the required legislative framework for market introduction is limited. Therefore, this research aims at identifying the market and legislative framework conditions in the three leading biomethane markets in Europe and compare them to the framework conditions of the top six non-European biomethane markets. This study shows the global status and national differences in promoting this renewable energy carrier. For the cross-country comparison, a systematic and iterative literature review is conducted. The results show the top three European biomethane markets (Germany, United Kingdom, Sweden) and the six non-European biomethane markets (Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, South Korea, and the United States of America), pursuing different promotion approaches and framework conditions. Noteworthy cross-national findings are the role of state-level incentives, the tendency to utilise biomethane as vehicular fuel and the focus on residues and waste as feedstock for biomethane production. Presenting a cross-country comparison, this study supports cross-country learning for the promotion of renewable energies like biomethane and gives a pertinent overview of the work.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
Abboud S., 2010, POTENTIAL PRODUCTION
[2]   Communism's "Bright Past": Loyalty to the Party despite the Gulag [J].
Adler, Nanci .
CULTURE & HISTORY DIGITAL JOURNAL, 2014, 3 (02)
[3]  
Aikawa T., RESTRUCTURING JAPANS
[4]  
American Biogas Council, ABC RNG PUR REC
[5]  
American Biogas Council, BIOG STAT PROF
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, OFFICIAL J EUROPEA L
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ENERGETIC UTILIZATIO
[8]  
[Anonymous], OFF J EU L
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, EN BAL OECD COUNTR 2
[10]  
[Anonymous], REN FUEL STAND PROGR