A Money-Pump for Acyclic Intransitive Preferences

被引:12
作者
Gustafsson, Johan E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol, Div Philosophy, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
INDIFFERENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1746-8361.2010.01230.x
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The standard argument for the claim that rational preferences are transitive is the pragmatic money-pump argument. However, a money-pump only exploits agents with cyclic strict preferences. In order to pump agents who violate transitivity but without a cycle of strict preferences, one needs to somehow induce such a cycle. Methods for inducing cycles of strict preferences from non-cyclic violations of transitivity have been proposed in the literature, based either on offering the agent small monetary transaction premiums or on multi-dimensional preferences. This paper argues that previous proposals have been flawed and presents a new approach based on the dominance principle.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 257
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1957, Games and Decisions
[2]   THE DETERMINATENATESS OF THE UTILITY FUNCTION [J].
Armstrong, W. E. .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1939, 49 (195) :453-467
[3]  
Broome John., 1999, Ethics out of Economics
[4]  
Davidson Donald., 1955, Philosophy of Science, V22, P140, DOI DOI 10.1086/287412
[5]  
Gibbard A., 1978, FDN APPL DECISION TH, P125
[6]  
Gustafsson J., PHILOS Q IN PRESS
[7]   MONEY-PUMPS, SELF-TORTURERS AND THE DEMONS OF REAL-LIFE [J].
HANSSON, SO .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1993, 71 (04) :476-485
[8]  
Hansson SvenOve., 2001, HDB PHILOS LOGIC, V4, P319, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_4
[9]  
Jeffrey Richard C., 1983, LOGIC DECISION, V2nd
[10]  
Joyce J. M., 1999, FDN CAUSAL DECISION