A Bayesian joint model for continuous and zero-inflated count data in developmental toxicity studies

被引:3
作者
Hwang, Beom Seuk [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Appl Stat, 84 Heukseok Ro, Seoul 06974, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Bayesian inference; benchmark dose; data augmentation method; Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC); zero-inflated Poisson regression model; LATENT VARIABLE MODELS; BINOMIAL REGRESSION; CONTINUOUS OUTCOMES; POISSON REGRESSION; DISCRETE; BINARY;
D O I
10.29220/CSAM.2022.29.2.239
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
In many applications, we frequently encounter correlated multiple outcomes measured on the same subject. Joint modeling of such multiple outcomes can improve efficiency of inference compared to independent modeling. For instance, in developmental toxicity studies, fetal weight and number of malformed pups are measured on the pregnant dams exposed to different levels of a toxic substance, in which the association between such outcomes should be taken into account in the model. The number of malformations may possibly have many zeros, which should be analyzed via zero-inflated count models. Motivated by applications in developmental toxicity studies, we propose a Bayesian joint modeling framework for continuous and count outcomes with excess zeros. In our model, zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) regression model would be used to describe count data, and a subjectspecific random effects would account for the correlation across the two outcomes. We implement a Bayesian approach using MCMC procedure with data augmentation method and adaptive rejection sampling. We apply our proposed model to dose-response analysis in a developmental toxicity study to estimate the benchmark dose in a risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 250
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   BIVARIATE LATENT VARIABLE MODELS FOR CLUSTERED DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS OUTCOMES [J].
CATALANO, PJ ;
RYAN, LM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 87 (419) :651-658
[2]  
Celeux G, 2006, BAYESIAN ANAL, V1, P651, DOI 10.1214/06-BA122
[3]   UNDERSTANDING THE METROPOLIS-HASTINGS ALGORITHM [J].
CHIB, S ;
GREENBERG, E .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1995, 49 (04) :327-335
[4]   CALCULATION OF BENCHMARK DOSES FROM CONTINUOUS DATA [J].
CRUMP, KS .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1995, 15 (01) :79-89
[5]   Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of correlated zero-inflated count data [J].
Dagne, GA .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 46 (06) :653-663
[6]   Bayesian latent variable models for mixed discrete outcomes [J].
Dunson, DB ;
Herring, AH .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2005, 6 (01) :11-25
[7]   Bayesian latent variable models for clustered mixed outcomes [J].
Dunson, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2000, 62 :355-366
[8]   A Bayesian approach for joint modeling of cluster size and subunit-specific outcomes [J].
Dunson, DB ;
Chen, Z ;
Harry, J .
BIOMETRICS, 2003, 59 (03) :521-530
[9]   Risk Assessment for Toxicity Experiments with Discrete and Continuous Outcomes: A Bayesian Nonparametric Approach [J].
Fronczyk, Kassandra ;
Kottas, Athanasios .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2017, 22 (04) :585-601
[10]  
Gelman Andrew, 2014, Texts in Statistical Science Series, V3rd