Biogas Production from Co-digestion of Pennisetum pururem cv. Pakchong 1 Grass and Layer Chicken Manure Using Completely Stirred Tank

被引:28
作者
Wilawan, W. [1 ]
Pholchan, P. [2 ]
Aggarangsi, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Fac Engn, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Fac Engn, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
来源
2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING ECONOMIES (2013 AEDCEE) | 2014年 / 52卷
关键词
Pennisetum purpureum cv. Pakchong1 Grass; Chicken Manure; Co-digestion; Methane Yield; Biogas; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; FERMENTATION; METHANE; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.072
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this research, the production of biogas from co-digestion of Pennisetum purpureum cv. Pakchong1 grass and layer chicken manure using completely stirred tank was investigated. The experiment was defined to examine effect of the change in carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratios and the organic loading rates (OLRs) on biogas production and system steady-state performance. Primary analyses suggested that an approximate content of grass and manure was 50 : 50 % by weight to achieve C/N ratio of 20 and 70 : 30 % by weight for C/N ratio of 30 respectively. The experimental reactor was set to operate at a fixed total solid content of 4% with two cases of C/N ratio at four different OLRs of 1.1, 1.4, 1.7 and 2.2 kg VS/(m(3). d). Each condition was operated for 1.5 time of reactor retention time. The result suggested that maximum steady-state methane yield of 0.27 +/- 0.01 L CH4/kg VSadded can be achieved at C/N ratio of 20 with OLR of 1.1 kg VS/(m(3). d). Moreover, the results also suggested that methane yield decreased for an increase in OLR. Nonetheless, the work presented herein can provide an insight information for design and operation optimization according to economical investment analysis. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 222
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Dry mesophilic fermentation of chicken manure for production of methane by repeated batch culture [J].
Abouelenien, Fatma ;
Nakashimada, Yutaka ;
Nishio, Naomichi .
JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING, 2009, 107 (03) :293-295
[2]  
ANE AG, 1984, ENVIRON TECHNOL LETT, V5, P465
[3]   Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review [J].
Banos, R. ;
Manzano-Agugliaro, F. ;
Montoya, F. G. ;
Gil, C. ;
Alcayde, A. ;
Gomez, J. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (04) :1753-1766
[4]   High solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure [J].
Bujoczek, G ;
Oleszkiewicz, J ;
Sparling, R ;
Cenkowski, S .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2000, 76 (01) :51-60
[5]   Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure [J].
Callaghan, FJ ;
Wase, DAJ ;
Thayanithy, K ;
Forster, CF .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2002, 22 (01) :71-77
[6]   AMMONIA INHIBITION OF METHANOGENESIS FROM CATTLE WASTES [J].
HASHIMOTO, AG .
AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 1986, 17 (04) :241-261
[7]  
Ndon Udeme J, 1997, WATER RES, V31, P2455
[8]   CONTINUOUS AEROBIC TREATMENT OF PIGGERY SLURRY FOR ODOR CONTROL SCALED UP TO A FARM-SIZE UNIT [J].
SNEATH, RW ;
BURTON, CH ;
WILLIAMS, AG .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1992, 53 (01) :81-92
[9]  
Stijn C, 2012, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V41, P21
[10]   Thermal conversion of elephant grass (Pennisetum Purpureum Schum) to bio-gas, bio-oil and charcoal [J].
Strezov, Vladimir ;
Evans, Tim J. ;
Hayman, Chris .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (17) :8394-8399