Knowledge and decisions about maternal immunisation by pregnant women in Aotearoa New Zealand

被引:8
作者
Young, Amber [1 ]
Charania, Nadia A. [2 ]
Gauld, Natalie [3 ,4 ]
Norris, Pauline [5 ]
Turner, Nikki [6 ]
Willing, Esther [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Kohatu Ctr Hauora Maori, Otago Med Sch, Div Hlth Sci, POB 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
[2] Auckland Univ Technol, Sch Publ Hlth & Interdisciplinary Studies, Dept Publ Hlth, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Univ Auckland, Dept Paediat Child & Youth Hlth, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Univ Auckland, Sch Pharm, Auckland, New Zealand
[5] Univ Otago, Vaao Tautai Ctr Pacific Hlth, Dunedin, New Zealand
[6] Univ Auckland, Immunisat Advisory Ctr, Dept Gen Practice & Primary Care, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Maternal immunisation; Maternal vaccination; Maori health; Pacific health; Health inequity; Informed choice; INFLUENZA VACCINATION; PERTUSSIS VACCINATION; CARE; INITIATION; MOTHERS; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-022-08162-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Maternal vaccinations for influenza and pertussis are recommended in New Zealand to protect mothers and their infant from infection. However, maternal immunisation coverage in New Zealand is suboptimal. Furthermore, there is unacceptable inequitable maternal immunisation rates across the country with Maori and Pacific women having significantly lower maternal immunisation rates than those of other New Zealanders. Methods This research set out to explore what pregnant/recently pregnant Maori and Pacific women knew about immunisation during pregnancy and what factors influenced their decision to be vaccinated. A semi-structured interview guide was developed with questions focusing on knowledge of pertussis and influenza vaccination during pregnancy and decision-making. Maori and Pacific women aged over 16 years were purposively sampled and interviewed in Dunedin and Gisborne, New Zealand between May and August 2021. Interviews were analysed following a directed qualitative content approach. Data were arranged into coding nodes based on the study aims (deductive analysis) informed by previous literature and within these participant experiences were inductively coded into themes and subthemes. Results Not all women were aware of maternal vaccine recommendations or they diseases they protected against. Many underestimated how dangerous influenza and pertussis could be and some were more concerned about potential harms of the vaccine. Furthermore, understanding potential harms of infection and protection provided by vaccination did not necessarily mean women would choose to be vaccinated. Those who decided to vaccinate felt well-informed, had vaccination recommended by their healthcare provider, and did so to protect their and their infant's health. Those who decided against vaccination were concerned about safety of the vaccines, lacked the information they needed, were not offered the vaccine, or did not consider vaccination a priority. Conclusions There is a lack of understanding about vaccine benefits and risks of vaccine-preventable diseases which can result in the reinforcement of negative influences such as the fear of side effects. Furthermore, if vaccine benefits are not understood, inaccessibility of vaccines and the precedence of other life priorities may prevent uptake. Being well-informed and supported to make positive decisions to vaccinate in pregnancy is likely to improve vaccine coverage in Maori and Pacific Island New Zealanders.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2021, MAT CAR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, BEST PRACT J
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, IDCOMMUNITY DEMOGRAP
  • [4] Baker MG, 2020, PREVENTABLE MEASLES
  • [5] Sample size for qualitative research
    Boddy, Clive Roland
    [J]. QUALITATIVE MARKET RESEARCH, 2016, 19 (04): : 426 - 432
  • [6] Corbett S, 2014, NEW ZEAL MED J, V127, P53
  • [7] Cram F., 2001, RES ETHICS AOTEAROA, P35
  • [8] Vaccine decision-making begins in pregnancy: Correlation between vaccine concerns, intentions and maternal vaccination with subsequent childhood vaccine uptake
    Danchin, M. H.
    Costa-Pinto, J.
    Attwell, K.
    Willaby, H.
    Wiley, K.
    Hoq, M.
    Leask, J.
    Perrett, K. P.
    O'Keefe, Jacinta
    Giles, M. L.
    Marshall, H.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2018, 36 (44) : 6473 - 6479
  • [9] Daniel Ben K., 2019, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, V17, P118, DOI 10.34190/JBRM.17.3.002
  • [10] Do maternity services in New Zealand's public healthcare system deliver on equity? Findings from structural equation modelling of national maternal satisfaction survey data
    Dawson, Pauline
    Hay-Smith, Jean
    Jaye, Chrys
    Gauld, Robin
    Auvray, Benoit
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2021, 95