Optimal coupling combinations between irrigation frequency and rate for drip-irrigated maize grown on sandy soil

被引:84
作者
El-Hendawy, Salah E. [1 ]
Schmidhalter, Urs [2 ]
机构
[1] Suez Canal Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agron, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Plant Sci, D-85350 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
关键词
Deficit irrigation; Evapotranspiration; Grain yield; Maize; Sandy soil; Seasonal yield response factor (k(y)); Water use efficiency; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; ZEA-MAYS L; DEFICIT IRRIGATION; YIELD RESPONSE; CORN; CROP; NITROGEN; WHEAT; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; COEFFICIENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2009.11.002
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This study was conducted over 2 years (2007 and 2008) to establish the optimal combinations between irrigation frequency and rate for drip-irrigated maize using water production functions and water use-yield relationships. A field experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block split plot design with four irrigation frequencies (F-1, F-2, F-3 and F-4, irrigation events once every 1, 2, 3 or 4 days, respectively) and three drip irrigation rates (I-1: 1.00, I-2: 0.80, and I-3: 0.60 of the estimated evapotranspiration, ET) as the main and split plots, respectively. Our results show that yield variables and water use efficiencies (WUEs) increased with increasing irrigation frequency and rate, with nonsignificant differences between F-1 and F-2 in yield variables and between I-1 and I-2 in WUEs. Moreover, the combination between various irrigation frequencies and rates had an important effect on yield variables and WUEs, with the highest values being found for F1I2 and F2I1 and the lowest for F3I3 and F4I3. The F1I3 treatment had grain yield and yield components values similar to those obtained for the F3I2 and F4I1 treatments and WUEs values similar to those obtained for the F2I1 and F2I2 treatments. Seasonal yield response factors (k(y)) were 1.81 and 1.86 in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Production functions of yield versus seasonal crop ET were linear for all combinations of irrigation frequency and rate and for all irrigation frequency treatments with the exception of the F-1 treatment, which instead showed a second order relationship. The relationship between WUE and grain yield was best represented by a power equation. In conclusion, we identified the optimal coupling combinations between irrigation frequency and water application rate to achieve the maximum yield and WUEs under either sufficient (F2I1) or limited irrigation (F1I3) water supplies. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 448
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Computing the crop water production function for onion [J].
Al-Jamal, MS ;
Sammis, TW ;
Ball, S ;
Smeal, D .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2000, 46 (01) :29-41
[2]  
Allen R.G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56
[3]  
ALVES IL, 1991, PLANNING OPERATION A, V1, P154
[4]   Kernel number prediction in maize under nitrogen or water stress [J].
Andrade, FH ;
Echarte, L ;
Rizzalli, R ;
Della Maggiora, A ;
Casanovas, M .
CROP SCIENCE, 2002, 42 (04) :1173-1179
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, CUKUROVA CONDITIONS
[6]   The effects of microdrip and conventional drip irrigation on water distribution and uptake [J].
Assouline, S .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2002, 66 (05) :1630-1636
[7]   Improving irrigation schedules by using a biophysical and a decisional model [J].
Bergez, JE ;
Deumier, JM ;
Lacroix, B ;
Leroy, P ;
Wallach, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2002, 16 (02) :123-135
[8]   Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn [J].
Çakir, R .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2004, 89 (01) :1-16
[9]  
Cassel D. K., 1986, Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, P901
[10]   Simulation of maize yield under water stress with the EPICphase and CROPWAT models [J].
Cavero, J ;
Farre, I ;
Debaeke, P ;
Faci, JM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2000, 92 (04) :679-690