Rethinking communication in risk interpretation and action

被引:19
作者
Khan, Shabana [1 ]
Mishra, Jyoti L. [2 ]
Lin, Kuna-hui Elaine [3 ,4 ]
Doyle, Emma E. H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Indian Res Acad, Sheikh Sarai Inst Area 2, Awadh Bhawan, FC-31,Press Enclave Marg, New Delhi 110017, India
[2] Univ Bradford, Sch Management, Emm Lane, Bradford BD9 4JL, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Acad Sinica, Res Ctr Environm Changes, Sect 2, 128 Acad Rd, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
[4] Clark Univ, George Perkins Marsh Inst, 950 Main St, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
[5] Massey Univ, Joint Ctr Disaster Res, Private Box 756, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
关键词
Risk; Communication; Uncertainty; Trust; Heuristics; Experience; DECISION-MAKING; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; MANAGEMENT; MEDIA; CHALLENGES; STRATEGIES; FREQUENCY; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-017-2942-z
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Communication is fundamental to the transfer of information between individuals, agencies and organizations, and therefore, it is crucial to planning and decision-making particularly in cases of uncertainty and risk. This paper brings forth some critical aspects of communication that need to be acknowledged and considered while managing risks. Most of the previous studies and theories on natural hazards and disaster management have limited perspective on communication, and hence, its implication is limited to awareness, warnings and emergency response to some selected events. This paper exposes the role of communication as a moderator of not just risk interpretation and action but also various factors responsible for shaping overall response, such as individual decision-making under uncertainty, heuristics, past experiences, learning, trust, complexity, scale and the social context. It suggests that communication is a process that influences decision-making in multiple ways, and therefore, it plays a critical role in shaping local responses to various risks. It opens up the scope for using communication beyond its current use as a tool to manage emergency situations. An in-depth understanding of ongoing communication and its implications can help to plan risk management more effectively over time rather than as a short-term response.
引用
收藏
页码:1709 / 1726
页数:18
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]  
Abarquez I., 2004, COMMUNITY BASED DISA
[2]   DISASTER WARNING AND COMMUNICATION PROCESSES IN 2 COMMUNITIES [J].
ANDERSON, WA .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 1969, 19 (02) :92-104
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ANNOTATED BIBLIO PUB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, RISK COMMUNICATION H
[5]   False alarms and close calls: A conceptual model of warning accuracy [J].
Barnes, Lindsey R. ;
Gruntfest, Eve C. ;
Hayden, Mary H. ;
Schultz, David M. ;
Benight, Charles .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2007, 22 (05) :1140-1147
[6]  
Bennett A, 2007, IASDR07 INT ASS SOC
[7]  
Blaikie P., 2003, At risk: Natural hazards, peoples vulnerability and disasters, V2nd
[8]  
Blaikie P., 1994, RISK NATURAL HAZARDS
[9]   Methods for Communicating the Complexity and Uncertainty of Oil Spill Response Actions and Tradeoffs [J].
Bostrom, Ann ;
Joslyn, Susan ;
Pavia, Robert ;
Walker, Ann Hayward ;
Starbird, Kate ;
Leschine, Thomas M. .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2015, 21 (03) :631-645
[10]   There is no publicity like word of mouth ... Lessons for communicating drinking water risks in the urban setting [J].
Bradford, Lori E. A. ;
Idowu, Blessing ;
Zagozewski, Rebecca ;
Bharadwaj, Lalita A. .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2017, 29 :23-40