Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly: safety and outcomes

被引:8
|
作者
Sato, Hirotaka [1 ]
Abe, Hirokazu [2 ]
Ikeda, Atsushi [3 ]
Miyagawa, Tomoaki [4 ]
Sato, Katsuhiko [5 ]
Tsukada, Sachiyuki [6 ]
机构
[1] Hokusuikai Kinen Hosp, Dept Urol, 3-2-1 Higashihara Cyo, Mito, Ibaraki 3100035, Japan
[2] Kameda Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Chiba, Japan
[3] Univ Tsukuba Hosp, Dept Urol, Ibaraki, Japan
[4] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Urol, Saitama Med Ctr, Saitama, Japan
[5] Eastern Oomiya Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Saitama, Japan
[6] Hokusuikai Kinen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
Elderly; minimally invasive surgery; perioperative morbidity; laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy; anatomical correction rate; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; UROGYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; WOMEN; TERMINOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; MORBIDITY; COHORT; AGE;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2020.1867968
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Due to its low postoperative complication rate, vaginal surgery is the preferred intervention for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in elderly patients. We aimed to assess outcomes and perioperative complication rates associated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in elderly women. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 74 consecutive patients [52 (70.3%) aged <75 years; 22 (29.7%) aged >= 75 years] with POP who underwent LSC between August 2015 and December 2017. We evaluated preoperative risks using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and complications, using the Clavien-Dindo grading (CDG). No between-group differences were observed in CCI. CDG indicated fewer perioperative complications in patients aged >75 years. Anatomical success rates at 15 months were 95.5% and 90.4% in patients aged >= 75 and <75 years, respectively. LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age. Thus, the appropriate surgical intervention method would depend on the patient's health and comorbidities. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is a superior method to vaginal surgery because of its anatomical and functional outcomes, particularly regarding sexual activity. What do the results of this study add? In this single-center study with a 15-month follow-up, we demonstrated that LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age at the time of surgery. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the >= 75 and <75 years groups. Thus, LSC may be considered for women aged >75 years. However, in these elderly patients, the surgical method should be determined according to their health status and medical comorbidities. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Age should not be the basis for exclusion from laparoscopic procedures. Moreover, LSC is a suitable and valid option for elderly women with POP. As the study population consisted of a homogenous group of Japanese women, it lacks generalisability. Studies evaluating these outcomes are required in other populations.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 115
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Surgery for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Xia, Mengting
    Shi, Xiaojun
    Wang, Jiaxi
    Mao, Peiyu
    Mei, Shanshan
    Wang, Xinyan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 86 (05) : 978 - 987
  • [32] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
    Campagna, G.
    Panico, G.
    Caramazza, D.
    Anchora, L. P.
    Parello, A.
    Gallucci, V
    Vacca, L.
    Scambia, G.
    Ercoli, A.
    Ratto, C.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (06) : 573 - 584
  • [33] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as the mainstay management for significant apical pelvic organ prolapse (LAP) study
    Kalis, Vladimir
    Smazinka, Martin
    Rusavy, Zdenek
    Blaganje, Mija
    Havir, Martin
    Havelkova, Linda
    Ismail, Khaled
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 244 : 60 - 65
  • [34] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Comparison of standard versus tacker combination method
    Yoshizawa, Tsuyoshi
    Mochida, Junichi
    Yamaguchi, Kenya
    Kadotani, Masaya
    Hashimoto, Sho
    Funakoshi, Daigo
    Sakurai, Fuminori
    Hori, Yutaro
    Obinata, Daisuke
    Takahashi, Satoru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 28 (12) : 1227 - 1232
  • [35] Clinical and urodynamic assessment in patients with pelvic organ prolapse before and after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
    Abdullah, Bahiyah
    Nomura, Jimmy
    Moriyama, Shingo
    Huang, Tingwen
    Tokiwa, Shino
    Togo, Mio
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 (10) : 1543 - 1549
  • [36] A Review of the Current Status of Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Lee, Richard K.
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Payne, Christopher K.
    Waltregny, David
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) : 1128 - 1137
  • [37] Cost analysis of surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or transvaginal mesh
    Carracedo, D.
    Lopez-Fando, L.
    Sanchez, M. D.
    Jimenez, M. A.
    Gomez, J. M.
    Laso, I.
    Rodriguez, M. A.
    Burgos, F. J.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2017, 41 (02): : 117 - 122
  • [38] Clinical outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: A 3-year follow-up study
    Sawada, Yugo
    Kitagawa, Yasuhide
    Hayashi, Tokumasa
    Tokiwa, Shino
    Nagae, Mika
    Cortes, Auran Rosanne
    Nomura, Masayoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 216 - 219
  • [39] Anatomical insights into sacrocolpopexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    Campagna, Giuseppe
    Delmas, Vincent
    Ferrari, Stefania
    Morciano, Andrea
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Cervigni, Mauro
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2016, 35 (07) : 813 - 818
  • [40] Preoperative ultrasound findings as risk factors of recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
    Santis-Moya, Fernanda
    Pineda, Rodrigo
    Miranda, Victor
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (04) : 955 - 960