Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly: safety and outcomes

被引:8
|
作者
Sato, Hirotaka [1 ]
Abe, Hirokazu [2 ]
Ikeda, Atsushi [3 ]
Miyagawa, Tomoaki [4 ]
Sato, Katsuhiko [5 ]
Tsukada, Sachiyuki [6 ]
机构
[1] Hokusuikai Kinen Hosp, Dept Urol, 3-2-1 Higashihara Cyo, Mito, Ibaraki 3100035, Japan
[2] Kameda Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Chiba, Japan
[3] Univ Tsukuba Hosp, Dept Urol, Ibaraki, Japan
[4] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Urol, Saitama Med Ctr, Saitama, Japan
[5] Eastern Oomiya Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Saitama, Japan
[6] Hokusuikai Kinen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
Elderly; minimally invasive surgery; perioperative morbidity; laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy; anatomical correction rate; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; UROGYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; WOMEN; TERMINOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; MORBIDITY; COHORT; AGE;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2020.1867968
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Due to its low postoperative complication rate, vaginal surgery is the preferred intervention for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in elderly patients. We aimed to assess outcomes and perioperative complication rates associated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in elderly women. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 74 consecutive patients [52 (70.3%) aged <75 years; 22 (29.7%) aged >= 75 years] with POP who underwent LSC between August 2015 and December 2017. We evaluated preoperative risks using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and complications, using the Clavien-Dindo grading (CDG). No between-group differences were observed in CCI. CDG indicated fewer perioperative complications in patients aged >75 years. Anatomical success rates at 15 months were 95.5% and 90.4% in patients aged >= 75 and <75 years, respectively. LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age. Thus, the appropriate surgical intervention method would depend on the patient's health and comorbidities. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is a superior method to vaginal surgery because of its anatomical and functional outcomes, particularly regarding sexual activity. What do the results of this study add? In this single-center study with a 15-month follow-up, we demonstrated that LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age at the time of surgery. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the >= 75 and <75 years groups. Thus, LSC may be considered for women aged >75 years. However, in these elderly patients, the surgical method should be determined according to their health status and medical comorbidities. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Age should not be the basis for exclusion from laparoscopic procedures. Moreover, LSC is a suitable and valid option for elderly women with POP. As the study population consisted of a homogenous group of Japanese women, it lacks generalisability. Studies evaluating these outcomes are required in other populations.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 115
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lower urinary tract function improves after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for elderly patients with pelvic organ prolapse
    Togo, Mio
    Kitta, Takeya
    Kanno, Yukiko
    Ouchi, Mifuka
    Tokiwa, Shino
    Huang, Tingwen
    Moriyama, Shingo
    Nomura, Jimmy
    Moriya, Kimihiko
    Shinohara, Nobuo
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2020, 12 (03) : 260 - 265
  • [2] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse
    Najib, Bernard
    Rusavy, Zdenek
    Abdallah, Wael
    Deval, Bruno
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 52 (09)
  • [3] Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as the treatment of choice for pelvic organ prolapse
    Mourad, Sherif
    El Shawaf, Hisham
    Farouk, Ahmed
    Maged, Hisham Abdel
    Noweir, Amr
    Deval, Bruno
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 17 (01) : 30 - 39
  • [4] Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Compared with Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
    Yang, Yingying
    Li, Zhen
    Si, Keyi
    Dai, Qingqiang
    Qiao, Yingying
    Li, Dazhuang
    Zhang, Li
    Wu, Fan
    He, Jia
    Wu, Guizhu
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 30 (10) : 833 - 840.e2
  • [5] Urodynamic findings and functional outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse
    Illiano, Ester
    Natale, Franca
    Giannantoni, Antonella
    Gubbiotti, Marilena
    Balzarro, Matteo
    Costantini, Elisabetta
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (04) : 589 - 594
  • [6] The use of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of pelvic organ prolapse
    Gadonneix, P
    Ercoli, A
    Scambia, G
    Villet, R
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 17 (04) : 376 - 380
  • [7] Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Sung, Hyun Hwan
    Ko, Kwang Jin
    Suh, Yoon Seok
    Ryu, Gyu Ha
    Lee, Kyu-Sung
    INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 21 (01) : 68 - 74
  • [8] Urodynamic findings and functional outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse
    Ester Illiano
    Franca Natale
    Antonella Giannantoni
    Marilena Gubbiotti
    Matteo Balzarro
    Elisabetta Costantini
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2019, 30 : 589 - 594
  • [9] FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AND URODYNAMIC FINDINGS AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY FOR SEVERE PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Costantini, Elisabetta
    Natale, Franca
    Maddonni, Stefania
    Cagini, Roberta
    Balsamo, Raffaele
    Pastore, Antonio Luigi
    Illiano, Ester
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2017, 36 : S19 - S20
  • [10] Current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
    Gonzalez-Enguita, Carmen
    Gennaro-DellaRossa, Natalia
    Lopez-Lopez, Esther
    Escobar-Castano, Juliana
    Miguel Rodriguez-Castro, Percy
    Gonzalez-Lopez, Raquel
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2017, 70 (04): : 400 - 411