Detection of interferences in an additive manufacturing process: an experimental study integrating methods of feature selection and machine learning

被引:22
作者
Stanisavljevic, Darko [1 ]
Cemernek, David [2 ]
Gursch, Heimo [2 ]
Urak, Guenter [2 ]
Lechner, Gernot [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Virtual Vehicle Res Ctr, Graz, Austria
[2] Know Ctr GmbH, Graz, Austria
[3] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Dept Prod & Operat Management, Univ Str 15-E3, A-8010 Graz, Austria
关键词
additive manufacturing; machine learning; 3D-printer; interference detection; data processing system; feature engineering; MONITORING-SYSTEM; SENSOR FUSION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2019.1694719
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing becomes a more and more important technology for production, mainly driven by the ability to realise extremely complex structures using multiple materials but without assembly or excessive waste. Nevertheless, like any high-precision technology additive manufacturing responds to interferences during the manufacturing process. These interferences - like vibrations - might lead to deviations in product quality, becoming manifest for instance in a reduced lifetime of a product or application issues. This study targets the issue of detecting such interferences during a manufacturing process in an exemplary experimental setup. Collection of data using current sensor technology directly on a 3D-printer enables a quantitative detection of interferences. The evaluation provides insights into the effectiveness of the realised application-oriented setup, the effort required for equipping a manufacturing system with sensors, and the effort for acquisition and processing the data. These insights are of practical utility for organisations dealing with additive manufacturing: the chosen approach for detecting interferences shows promising results, reaching interference detection rates of up to 100% depending on the applied data processing configuration.
引用
收藏
页码:2862 / 2884
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Allen Ronald L, 2004, Signal Analysis
[2]  
Alpaydin E., 2010, Introduction to machine learning, V2
[3]  
Altintas Y, 2012, MANUFACTURING AUTOMATION: METAL CUTTING MECHANICS, MACHINE TOOL VIBRATIONS, AND CNC DESIGN, 2ND EDITION, P1
[4]   Tool condition monitoring system: A review [J].
Ambhore, Nitin ;
Kamble, Dinesh ;
Chinchanikar, Satish ;
Wayal, Vishal .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2015, 2 (4-5) :3419-3428
[5]   In-situ monitoring of polymer flow temperature and pressure in extrusion based additive manufacturing [J].
Anderegg, David A. ;
Bryant, Hunter A. ;
Ruffin, Devante C. ;
Skrip, Stephen M., Jr. ;
Fallon, Jacob J. ;
Gilmer, Eric L. ;
Bortner, Michael J. .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 26 :76-83
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Foundations of Signal Processing
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, STRUCTURAL SYNTACTIC, DOI DOI 10.1007/3-540-70659-3_2
[8]   Multi sensor signal processing for catastrophic tool failure detection in turning [J].
Balsamo, Vittorio ;
Caggiano, Alessandra ;
Jemielniak, Krzysztof ;
Kossakowska, Joanna ;
Nejman, Miroslaw ;
Teti, Roberto .
RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN MANUFACTURING: KEY ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE FACTORIES OF THE FUTURE - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 48TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2016, 41 :939-944
[9]   Design for manufacturing and assembly/disassembly: joint design of products and production systems [J].
Battaia, Olga ;
Dolgui, Alexandre ;
Heragu, Sunderesh S. ;
Meerkov, Semyon M. ;
Tiwari, Manoj Kumar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (24) :7181-7189
[10]  
Boashash B, 2003, TIME FREQUENCY SIGNAL ANALYSIS AND PROCESSING: A COMPREHENSIVE REFERENCE, P627