Assessing the impact of arthropod natural enemies on crop pests at the field scale

被引:76
作者
Macfadyen, Sarina [1 ]
Davies, Andrew P. [2 ]
Zalucki, Myron P. [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Agr Flagship, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] CSIRO, ACRI, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
mortality; parasitism; pest control; predation; semifield; ARMIGERA HUBNER LEPIDOPTERA; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; HELICOVERPA-ARMIGERA; TRICHOGRAMMA HYMENOPTERA; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; PARASITOID DIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; COTTON; APHID; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/1744-7917.12174
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
There are many reasons why it is important that we find ways to conserve, and better utilize natural enemies of invertebrate crop pests. Currently, measures of natural enemy impact are rarely incorporated into studies that purport to examine pest control. Most studies examine pest and natural enemy presence and/or abundance and then qualitatively infer impact. While this provides useful data to address a range of ecological questions, a measure of impact is critical for guiding pest management decision-making. Often some very simple techniques can be used to obtain an estimate of natural enemy impact. We present examples of field-based studies that have used cages, barriers to restrict natural enemy or prey movement, direct observation of natural enemy attack, and sentinel prey items to estimate mortality. The measure of natural enemy impact used in each study needs to be tailored to the needs of farmers and the specific pest problems they face. For example, the magnitude of mortality attributed to natural enemies may be less important than the timing and consistency of that mortality between seasons. Tailoring impact assessments will lead to research outcomes that do not simply provide general information about how to conserve natural enemies, but how to use these natural enemies as an integral part of decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 34
页数:15
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, REV BENEFICIALS COTT
[2]   Comparing the predatory performance of green lacewing on cotton bollworm on conventional and Bt cotton [J].
Bahar, M. H. ;
Stanley, J. N. ;
Gregg, P. C. ;
Del Socorro, A. P. ;
Kristiansen, P. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY, 2012, 136 (04) :263-270
[3]  
Banks J. E., 2011, Biopesticides International, V7, P113
[4]   Parasitism of cotton leafworm Alabama argillacea eggs by Trichogramma pretiosum in commercial cotton fields [J].
Bastos, C. S. ;
Torres, J. B. ;
Suinaga, F. A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY, 2010, 134 (07) :572-580
[5]   Spatial co-occurrence networks predict the feeding histories of polyphagous arthropod predators at field scales [J].
Bell, James R. ;
King, R. Andrew ;
Bohan, David A. ;
Symondson, William O. C. .
ECOGRAPHY, 2010, 33 (01) :64-72
[6]   Antipredator behaviour of Myzus persicae affects transmission efficiency of Broad bean wilt virus 1 [J].
Belliure, Belen ;
Amoros-Jimenez, Rocco ;
Fereres, Alberto ;
Angeles Marcos-Garcia, M. .
VIRUS RESEARCH, 2011, 159 (02) :206-214
[7]   Measuring Natural Pest Suppression at Different Spatial Scales Affects the Importance of Local Variables [J].
Bennett, A. B. ;
Gratton, C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2012, 41 (05) :1077-1085
[8]   Interactions between conventional and organic farming for biocontrol services across the landscape [J].
Bianchi, F. J. J. A. ;
Ives, A. R. ;
Schellhorn, N. A. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2013, 23 (07) :1531-1543
[9]   Spatial variability in ecosystem services: simple rules for predator-mediated pest suppression [J].
Bianchi, F. J. J. A. ;
Schellhorn, N. A. ;
Buckley, Y. M. ;
Possingham, H. P. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2010, 20 (08) :2322-2333
[10]   Predicting the time to colonization of the parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum: The importance of the shape of spatial dispersal kernels for biological control [J].
Bianchi, F. J. J. A. ;
Schellhorn, N. A. ;
van der Werf, W. .
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2009, 50 (03) :267-274