Predictive factors for pain experienced at office fluid minihysteroscopy

被引:46
作者
Cicinelli, Ettore
Rossi, A. Cristina
Marinaccio, Marco
Matteo, Maria
Saliani, Nicola
Tinelli, Raffaele
机构
[1] Univ Bari, Unit Obstet & Gynecol 4, I-70100 Bari, Italy
[2] Univ Bari, Unit Obstet & Gynecol 1, I-70100 Bari, Italy
[3] Univ Foggia, Unit Obstet & Gynecol, Foggia, Italy
关键词
fluid minihysteroscopy; pain; predictive factors; chronic pelvic pain; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; OUTPATIENT HYSTEROSCOPY; TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASOUND; ENDOMETRIAL BIOPSY; FEASIBILITY; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2007.03.008
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study objective: Fluid minihysteroscopy is in most cases a painless procedure. However, rarely, severe pain and side effects are reported. The goal of this study was to identify predictive factors of pain at minihysteroscopy. Design: Prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: Academic environment. Patients: Five hundred thirty-three women undergoing fluid minihysteroscopy. Interventions: Diagnostic fluid minihysteroscopy. Measurements and main results: The women were asked to score pain perception on a visual analog scale from zero (no pain) to 5 (unbearable pain). Correlation between pain at procedure and parity, previous cesarean section (PCS), menopausal status, anxiety, and chronic pelvic pain (CPP) was evaluated. Four hundred thirteen women (78%) reported no pain or discomfort (0-1 pain score, group A), while 120 (22%) experienced mild to unbearable pain (2-5 pain score, group B). Instances of PCS, CPP, anxiety, and menopause were significantly lower in group A than in group B (4% vs 82%, 0% vs 29%, 62% vs 72%, 25% vs 72%, respectively), whereas menopausal status was less frequent in group A (25.2%) than in group B (72.5%). At binary logistic regression, all the variables were independent risk factors for pain; however, when CPP was stratified for intensity, no correlation between pain at procedure and intensity of CPP was found. Conclusion: Previous cesarean section, CPP, anxiety, and menopause are predictive factors for pain perception during fluid ruinihysteroscopy, and history of CPP even of low intensity is predictive of pain at hysteroscopy. These patients may benefit from local anesthesia. (C) 2007 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 488
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, saline infusion sonography and hysteroscopy to investigate postmenopausal bleeding and unscheduled bleeding on HRT [J].
Cameron, ST ;
Walker, J ;
Chambers, S ;
Critchley, H .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 41 (03) :291-294
[2]   Office mini-hysteroscopy [J].
Campo, R ;
Van Belle, Y ;
Rombauts, L ;
Brosens, I ;
Gordts, S .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 1999, 5 (01) :73-81
[3]   Tolerability and cardiovascular complications of outpatient diagnostic minihysteroscopy compared with conventional hysteroscopy [J].
Cicinelli, E ;
Schönauer, LM ;
Barba, B ;
Tartagni, M ;
Luisi, D ;
Di Naro, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2003, 10 (03) :399-402
[4]   Reliability, feasibility, and safety of minihysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach: experience with 6,000 cases [J].
Cicinelli, E ;
Parisi, C ;
Galantino, P ;
Pinto, V ;
Barba, B ;
Schonauer, S .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (01) :199-202
[5]  
Cicinelli E, 1998, J REPROD MED, V43, P1014
[6]  
DELACO P, 2000, J AM ASSOC GYN LAP, V7, P71
[7]  
Howard F M, 1993, Obstet Gynecol Surv, V48, P357, DOI 10.1097/00006254-199306000-00001
[8]   Flexible outpatient hysteroscopy without anaesthesia: a safe, successful and well tolerated procedure [J].
Kremer, C ;
Barik, S ;
Duffy, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 105 (06) :672-676
[9]   Patient satisfaction with outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy: randomised controlled trial [J].
Kremer, C ;
Duffy, S ;
Moroney, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7230) :279-282
[10]   2500 outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopies [J].
Nagele, F ;
OConnor, H ;
Davies, A ;
Badawy, A ;
Mohamed, H ;
Magos, A .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 88 (01) :87-92