Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial

被引:78
|
作者
Li, Junxiang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiao [1 ]
Liu, Jin [1 ]
Wang, Xia [1 ]
Li, Xiangkui [3 ]
Wang, Yaping [4 ]
Ouyang, Wen [5 ]
Li, Jun [6 ,7 ]
Yao, Shanglong [8 ]
Zhu, Zhaoqiong [9 ]
Guo, Qulian [10 ]
Yu, Yonghao [11 ]
Meng, Jinhai [12 ]
Zuo, Yunxia [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Pi Dist Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Anesthesiol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[5] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Anesthesiol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[6] Wenzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Anesthesiol, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Wenzhou Med Univ, Yuying Childrens Hosp, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[8] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Union Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[9] Affiliated Hosp, Zunyi Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Zunyi, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[10] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[11] Tianjin Med Univ, Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[12] Ningxia Med Univ, Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Yinchuan, Ningxia, Peoples R China
关键词
ciprofol; colonoscopy; deep sedation; gastroscopy; propofol; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; ANESTHESIA; MIDAZOLAM; INJECTION; SAFETY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1111/bcpt.13761
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Ciprofol is a propofol analogue with improved pharmacokinetic properties. A multi-centre, non-inferiority trial was conducted to compare the deep sedation properties of ciprofol and propofol with a non-inferiority margin of 8% in patients undergoing gastroscopy and colonoscopy. In total, 289 patients were randomly allocated for surgery (259 colonoscopy and 30 gastroscopy) at a 1:1 ratio to be given intravenous injections of ciprofol (0.4 mg/kg) or propofol (1.5 mg/kg). The primary outcome was the success rate of colonoscopy defined as colonoscopy completion with no need for an alternative sedative or >5 ciprofol or propofol top up doses within any 15-min time period. The success rate of colonoscopy was 100% in the ciprofol group vs. 99.2% in the propofol group (mean difference 0.8%, 95% CI: -2.2% to 4.2%). Except for the gastrointestinal lesions found during the gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures, the occurrence rates of adverse drug reactions in the ciprofol and propofol groups were 31.3% and 62.8%, respectively (P < 0.001). Pain on injection was less common in the ciprofol group (4.9% vs. 52.4%, P < 0.001). The outcomes demonstrated that ciprofol was non-inferior to propofol with regard to successful sedation for gastroscopy or colonoscopy procedures and no obvious important adverse events occurred.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 148
页数:11
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial
    Gan, Tong J.
    Bertoch, Todd
    Habib, Ashraf S.
    Yan, Pangke
    Zhou, Rong
    Lai, Yu-Ling
    Liu, Xiao
    Essandoh, Michael
    Daley, William L.
    Gelb, Adrian W.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 140 (04) : 690 - 700
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of HSK3486 for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in elective surgical patients: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, propofol-controlled phase 2 clinical trial
    Zeng, Y.
    Wang, D-X
    Lin, Z-M
    Liu, J.
    Wei, X-C
    Deng, J.
    Liu, Y-F
    Ma, E-L
    Yang, M-C
    Zheng, H.
    Yu, X-D
    Guo, Q-L
    Guan, Y-J
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (04) : 1114 - 1124
  • [3] Inhaled isoflurane via the anaesthetic conserving device versus propofol for sedation of invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units in Germany and Slovenia: an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial
    Meiser, Andreas
    Volk, Thomas
    Wallenborn, Jan
    Guenther, Ulf
    Becher, Tobias
    Bracht, Hendrik
    Schwarzkopf, Konrad
    Knafelj, Rihard
    Faltlhauser, Andreas
    Thal, Serge C.
    Soukup, Jens
    Kellner, Patrick
    Druner, Matthias
    Vogelsang, Heike
    Bellgardt, Martin
    Sackey, Peter
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (11): : 1231 - 1240
  • [4] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial
    Kim, Hyun-Sook
    Choi, Won-Ho
    Kim, Bo Young
    Kim, Sung Soo
    Lee, Sang-Il
    Kim, Sang-Hyon
    Choi, Sung Jae
    Kim, Geun-Tae
    Hur, Jin-Wuk
    Lee, Myeung-Su
    Kim, Yun Sung
    Hong, Seung-Jae
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (06)