Utility of abdominal skin punch biopsy for detecting systemic amyloidosis

被引:9
作者
Wu, Bicong [1 ]
Pak, Daniel M. [2 ]
Smith, Kelly D. [1 ]
Shinohara, Michi M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, 1959 NE Pacific St,Box 357470, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Div Dermatol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
abdominal skin punch biopsy; AL amyloidosis; diagnostic sensitivity; diagnostic specificity; systemic amyloidosis; DIAGNOSIS; ASPIRATION;
D O I
10.1111/cup.14070
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Early and accurate diagnosis of systemic amyloidosis (SA) is critical for optimal patient outcomes. Biopsy of clinically uninvolved skin and subcutaneous tissue including abdominal skin punch biopsy (ASPB) is often used as a surrogate for affected organ sampling. There is a lack of published data on the sensitivity and specificity of ASPB for diagnosing SA. Methods Retrospective chart review between 2000 and 2020 of all ASPB was performed to diagnose SA. Amyloid deposition was confirmed by Congo red stain. Study group includes patients with histopathologically and clinically confirmed diagnosis of SA. Control group includes patients without histopathology of amyloid deposition and no clinical SA. Results Forty-one patients meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed; 23 study group and 18 control group patients. The overall diagnostic sensitivity of ASPB was 43% (95% CI 23%-66%) and the specificity 100% (95% CI 81%-100%). The AL amyloidosis diagnostic sensitivity was 64% (95% CI 35%-87%). ASPB >10 mm in depth had 100% (95% CI 54%-100%) sensitivity compared to 24% for depth <= 10 mm (P = .002). Conclusions ASPB is a minimally invasive and highly specific method of diagnosing SA. It is particularly sensitive for diagnosing AL amyloidosis and the diagnostic sensitivity can be significantly improved with adequate biopsy depth and diameter.
引用
收藏
页码:1342 / 1346
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
Hazenberg BPC, 2004, NETH J MED, V62, P121
[12]   Amyloidosis-the Diagnosis and Treatment of an Underdiagnosed Disease [J].
Ihne, Sandra ;
Morbach, Caroline ;
Sommer, Claudia ;
Geier, Andreas ;
Knop, Stefan ;
Stoerk, Stefan .
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 117 (10) :159-+
[13]   Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis and Treatment of TTR Amyloidosis [J].
Kapoor, Mahima ;
Rossor, Alexander M. ;
Laura, Matilde ;
Reilly, Mary M. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 6 (02) :189-199
[14]   Incidence of AL Amyloidosis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1990 through 2015 [J].
Kyle, Robert A. ;
Larson, Dirk R. ;
Kurtin, Paul J. ;
Kumar, Shaji ;
Cerhan, James R. ;
Themeau, Terry M. ;
Rajkumar, S. Vincent ;
Vachon, Celine M. ;
Dispenzieri, Angela .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2019, 94 (03) :465-471
[15]   Minor salivary gland biopsy is more effective than normal appearing skin biopsy for amyloid detection in systemic amyloidosis: A prospective monocentric study [J].
Lecadet, Aude ;
Bachmeyer, Claude ;
Buob, David ;
Cez, Alexandre ;
Georgin-Lavialle, Sophie .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 57 :E20-E21
[16]   Dermatopathologic findings in 20 cases of systemic amyloidosis [J].
Lee, DD ;
Huang, CY ;
Wong, CK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY, 1998, 20 (05) :438-442
[17]   Utility of abdominal skin plus subcutaneous fat and rectal mucosal biopsy in the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis with renal involvement [J].
Li, Ting ;
Huang, Xianghua ;
Cheng, Shuiqin ;
Zhao, Liang ;
Rene, Guisheng ;
Chen, Wencui ;
Wang, Qingwen ;
Zeng, Caihong ;
Liu, Zhihong .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09)
[18]   Molecular and clinical insights into protein misfolding and associated amyloidosis [J].
Pande, Monu ;
Srivastava, Ragini .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, 184
[19]   The Pathology of Amyloidosis in Classification: A Review [J].
Picken, Maria M. .
ACTA HAEMATOLOGICA, 2020, 143 (04) :322-334
[20]  
Picken MM, 2010, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V134, P545, DOI 10.1043/1543-2165-134.4.545