RETRACTED: Conservation and Development of Residential-Type Historical and Cultural Blocks in Guangzhou under Subjective Evaluation (Retracted Article)

被引:1
作者
Ma, Yue [1 ]
Wang, Zhongwei [1 ]
Li, Nan [2 ]
Chen, Jue [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Art & Design, Guangzhou 510320, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Coll Architecture, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS | 2022年 / 2022卷
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2022/8589660
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Historical and cultural blocks not only carry numerous cultural heritages but always undertake urban functions. As a major driver of urban context construction, historical and cultural blocks have never been abandoned by the times. Regardless of the purposes for which they were built in the first place, all historical and cultural blocks should be extended functionally to rejuvenate them in current and future developments. In particular, in single-functional residential-type historical and cultural blocks, the large numbers of traditional architectures left vacant by out-migrating residents can be redeveloped for other functions. The effectiveness of block conservation and development affects the cultural construction of a city. More importantly, it is closely related to all kinds of users in blocks, as users engage in in-depth interactions with environments and are best able to discover the merits of block conservation and development. Moreover, the conservation and optimal design of historical and cultural blocks must, ultimately, be based on the users' needs. By collecting users' subjective evaluation opinions about two typical residential-type historical and cultural blocks based on the existing evaluation index and putting them through quantitative analysis, this paper analyzes block status in many aspects. It identifies focuses on optimization, offering references and suggestions for future development.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Chao C., 2022, URBAN PROBLEMS, V319, P46
[2]  
Cheng L., 2018, CHINA ANCIENT CITY, V201, P77
[3]  
Jiaji Z., 2021, P 2021 CHINA URBAN P, P180
[4]  
Jianguo W, 2021, CASE STUDY DINGSHU A, V631, P1
[5]  
Jixiang S, 2009, CULTURAL HERITAGE CO
[6]  
Luning Z., 2020, NANJING SOCIAL SCI, V391, P149
[7]  
Mei W, 2011, STUDY PROTECTION REN
[8]  
Ming L., 2017, Planners, V33, P17
[9]  
Ming W, 2012, STUDY URBAN FORM EVO
[10]  
Xiang S.J., 2012, China Cult. Herit, V47, P58