Farm households? willingness to participate in China?s Grain-for-Green Program under different compensation scenarios

被引:21
作者
Peng, Jian [1 ]
Lu, Huiling [2 ,3 ]
Qiao, Ruilin [2 ]
Yu, Shuying [1 ]
Xu, Zihan [1 ]
Wu, Jiansheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Minist Educ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Sch Urban Planning & Design, Shenzhen Grad Sch, Key Lab Environm & Urban Sci, Shenzhen 518005, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Nat Resources, Inst Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 1, Xian 710054, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Payment for ecosystem services (PES); Grain -for -Green Program (GFGP); Household participation; Structural equation model; Mulan Paddock; China; EX-ANTE EVALUATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; WATERSHED SERVICES; RIVER-BASIN; PAYMENTS; URBANIZATION; SCHEMES; LESSONS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108890
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The Grain-for-Green Program (GFGP) in China, one of the largest payment fot ecosystem services (PES) pro-grams, has been regarded as an effective approach to achieving sustainable development. However, empirical research on factors motivating GFGP participation willingness remains limited and the comparison of the influencing pathways under different compensation scenarios is lacked. In this case study of farm households' willingness of participation in Mulan Paddock, China, based on a participatory rural appraisal with 11 sample towns and 438 valid questionnaires, the structural equation model was applied to identify key factors influencing participation in GFGP in Mulan Paddock before (2000) and after (2014) the program under different compen-sation scenarios (i.e. with or without subsidies). It was found that 84.28% of farm households had increased income after the implementation of the GFGP. When the government provided subsidies, the past program support would dominate the willingness to participate in the program. When the government did not provide subsidies, subjective perceptions about the ecological and economic benefits and awareness of landscape pro-tection were further supplemented as the most important factors for household participation. Under the subsi-dized scenario, neighborhood behavior could enhance household participation in the GFGP, while the participation decision was negatively influenced without subsidies. The findings provide guidance for better implementation of the next round GFGPs in China, and also for investigating the correlation between PES and social welfare in other non-developed areas.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Farmers' participation in the development of land use policies for the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia [J].
Ariti, Adenew Taffa ;
van Vliet, Jasper ;
Verburg, Peter H. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 71 :129-137
[2]   Payments for ecosystem services within the hybrid governance model: evaluating policy alignment and complementarity on California rangelands [J].
Biggs, Nicole Buckley ;
Hafner, Jayce ;
Mashiri, Fadzayi E. ;
Huntsinger, Lynn ;
Lambin, Eric F. .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 26 (01)
[3]   Drivers of landholder participation in tender programs for Australian biodiversity conservation [J].
Blackmore, Louise ;
Doole, Graeme J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2013, 33 :143-153
[4]   The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services [J].
Boerner, Jan ;
Baylis, Kathy ;
Corbera, Esteve ;
Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss ;
Honey-Roses, Jordi ;
Persson, U. Martin ;
Wunder, Sven .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 96 :359-374
[5]   When are payment for ecosystems services suitable for coral reef derived coastal protection?: A review of scientific requirements [J].
Brathwaite, Angelique ;
Pascal, Nicolas ;
Clua, Eric .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 49
[6]   What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioParamo program [J].
Bremer, Leah L. ;
Farley, Kathleen A. ;
Lopez-Carr, David .
LAND USE POLICY, 2014, 36 :122-133
[7]   China's response to a national land-system sustainability emergency [J].
Bryan, Brett A. ;
Gao, Lei ;
Ye, Yanqiong ;
Sun, Xiufeng ;
Connor, Jeffery D. ;
Crossman, Neville D. ;
Stafford-Smith, Mark ;
Wu, Jianguo ;
He, Chunyang ;
Yu, Deyong ;
Liu, Zhifeng ;
Li, Ang ;
Huang, Qingxu ;
Ren, Hai ;
Deng, Xiangzheng ;
Zheng, Hua ;
Niu, Jianming ;
Han, Guodong ;
Hou, Xiangyang .
NATURE, 2018, 559 (7713) :193-204
[8]  
Chang YX, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V269, DOI [10.1016/j.icarus.2020.110775, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110775]
[9]   Households' Willingness to Accept Improved Ecosystem Services and Influencing Factors: Application of Contingent Valuation Method in Bashang Plateau, Hebei Province, China [J].
Chu, Xi ;
Zhan, Jinyan ;
Wang, Chao ;
Hameeda, Sultan ;
Wang, Xiaoru .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 255
[10]   Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services [J].
Cumming, Graeme S. ;
Buerkert, Andreas ;
Hoffmann, Ellen M. ;
Schlecht, Eva ;
von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan ;
Tscharntke, Teja .
NATURE, 2014, 515 (7525) :50-57