Utilization Rates of Pancreatectomy, Radical Prostatectomy, and Nephrectomy in New York, Ontario, and New South Wales, 2011 to 2018

被引:11
作者
Pang, Hilary Y. M. [2 ,3 ]
Chalmers, Kelsey [4 ,5 ]
Landon, Bruce [6 ,7 ]
Elshaug, Adam G. [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Matelski, John [11 ]
Ling, Vicki [12 ]
Krzyzanowska, Monika K. [3 ,13 ]
Kulkarni, Girish [3 ,12 ,14 ]
Erickson, Bradley A. [15 ]
Cram, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ,12 ,16 ]
机构
[1] Sinai Hlth Syst, 200 Elizabeth St,Eaton 14th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Sydney, Menzies Ctr Hlth Policy, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Lown Inst, Brookline, MA USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Gen Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[8] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Policy, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Med Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[10] Brookings Inst, USC Brookings Schaeffer Initiat Hlth Policy, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[11] Toronto Gen Hosp, Biostat Res Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada
[12] ICES Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[13] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol & Haematol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[14] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[15] Univ Iowa & Clin, Dept Urol, Iowa City, IA USA
[16] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Gen Internal Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5477
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This cohort study compares population-level utilization of pancreatectomy, radical prostatectomy, and nephrectomy in New York (US), Ontario (Canada), and New South Wales (Australia) and how utilization differs for residents of lower- and higher-income neighborhoods. Importance Few studies have compared surgical utilization between countries or how rates may differ according to patients' socioeconomic status. Objective To compare population-level utilization of 3 common nonemergent surgical procedures in New York State (US), Ontario (Canada), and New South Wales (Australia) and how utilization differs for residents of lower- and higher-income neighborhoods. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included all adults aged 18 years and older who were hospitalized for pancreatectomy, radical prostatectomy, or nephrectomy between 2011 and 2016 in New York, between 2011 and 2018 in Ontario, and between 2013 and 2018 in New South Wales. Each patient's address of residence was linked to 2016 census data to ascertain neighborhood income. Data were analyzed from August 2019 to November 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were (1) each jurisdiction's per capita age- and sex-standardized utilization rates (procedures per 100 000 residents per year) for each surgery and (2) utilization rates among residents of lower- and higher-income neighborhoods. Results This study included 115 428 surgical patients (25 780 [22.3%] women); 5717, 21 752, and 24 617 patients in New York were hospitalized for pancreatectomy, radical prostatectomy, and nephrectomy, respectively; 4929, 19 125, and 16 916 patients in Ontario, respectively; and 2069, 13 499, and 6804 patients in New South Wales, respectively. Patients in New South Wales were older for all procedures (eg, radical prostatectomy, mean [SD] age in New South Wales, 64.8 [7.3] years; in New York, 62.7 [8.4] years; in Ontario, 62.8 [6.7] years; P < .001); patients in New York were more likely than those in other locations to be women for pancreatectomy (New York: 2926 [51.2%]; Ontario: 2372 [48.1%]; New South Wales, 1003 [48.5%]; P = .004) and nephrectomy (New York: 10 645 [43.2%]; Ontario: 6529 [38.6%]; 2605 [38.3%]; P < .001). With the exception of nephrectomy in Ontario, there was a higher annual utilization rate for all procedures in all jurisdictions among patients residing in affluent neighborhoods (quintile 5) compared with poorer neighborhoods (quintile 1). This difference was largest in New South Wales for pancreatectomy (4.65 additional procedures per 100 000 residents [SE, 0.28]; P < .001) and radical prostatectomy (73.46 additional procedures per 100 000 residents [SE, 1.20]; P < .001); largest in New York for nephrectomy (8.43 additional procedures per 100 000 residents [SE, 0.85]; P < .001) and smallest in New York for radical prostatectomy (19.70 additional procedures per 100 000 residents [SE, 2.63]; P < .001); and smallest in Ontario for pancreatectomy (1.15 additional procedures per 100 000 residents [SE, 0.28]; P < .001) and nephrectomy (-1.10 additional procedures per 100 000 residents [SE, 0.52]; P < .001). New York had the highest utilization of nephrectomy (28.93 procedures per 100 000 residents per year [SE, 0.18]) and New South Wales for had the highest utilization of pancreatectomy and radical prostatectomy (6.94 procedures per 100 000 residents per year [SE, 0.15] and 94.37 procedures per 100 000 residents per year [SE, 0.81], respectively; all P < .001). Utilization was lowest in Ontario for all procedures (pancreatectomy, 6.18 procedures per 100 000 residents per year [SE, 0.09]; radical prostatectomy, 49.24 procedures per 100 000 residents per year [SE, 0.36]; nephrectomy, 21. 40 procedures per 100 000 residents per year [SE, 0.16]; all P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, New York and New South Wales had higher per capita surgical utilization and larger neighborhood income-utilization gradients than Ontario. These findings suggest that income-based disparities are larger in the United States and Australia and smaller in Canada and highlight trade-offs inherent in the health care systems of different countries. Question Do utilization rates for pancreatectomy, radical prostatectomy, and nephrectomy differ between New York State (US), Ontario (Canada), and New South Wales (Australia), and do income-based differences in utilization vary between countries? Findings This cohort study of 115 428 surgical patients found significantly lower surgical utilization in Ontario than in New York and New South Wales. Residents of lower-income neighborhoods had lower rates of surgery than residents of higher-income neighborhoods in all countries; income-based differences were significantly smaller in Ontario than in New York and New South Wales. Meaning In this study, Ontario had lower surgical utilization rates and smaller differences in utilization between patients in high-income vs low-income neighborhoods, but income-based disparities were present in all jurisdictions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Outcomes and Resource Utilization in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: Evidence for Socioeconomic Disparities [J].
Agarwal, Shikhar ;
Garg, Aatish ;
Parashar, Akhil ;
Jaber, Wael A. ;
Menon, Venu .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2014, 3 (06)
[2]   It's Still The Prices, Stupid: Why The US Spends So Much On Health Care, And A Tribute To Uwe Reinhardt [J].
Anderson, Gerard F. ;
Hussey, Peter ;
Petrosyan, Varduhi .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2019, 38 (01) :87-95
[4]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2019, PERS INC AUSTR
[5]  
Australian Commission On Safety And Quality In Health Care, 3 4 RAD PROST HOSP A
[6]   Estimating misclassification error in a binary performance indicator: case study of low value care in Australian hospitals [J].
Badgery-Parker, Tim ;
Pearson, Sallie-Anne ;
Elshaug, Adam G. .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2020, 29 (12) :992-999
[7]   Nephrectomy - Indications, complications and postoperative mortality in 646 consecutive patients [J].
Beisland, C ;
Medby, PC ;
Sander, S ;
Beisland, HO .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 37 (01) :58-64
[8]   Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test [J].
Bell, Neil ;
Gorber, Sarah Connor ;
Shane, Amanda ;
Joffres, Michel ;
Singh, Harminder ;
Dickinson, James ;
Shaw, Elizabeth ;
Dunfield, Lesley ;
Tonelli, Marcello .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 186 (16) :1225-1234
[9]   Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[10]   American health care paradox-high spending on health care and poor health [J].
Bradley, E. H. ;
Sipsma, H. ;
Taylor, L. A. .
QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 110 (02) :61-65