共 35 条
Rapid and Accurate Left Ventricular Chamber Quantification Using a Novel CMR Segmentation Algorithm: A Clinical Validation Study
被引:27
作者:
Codella, Noel C. F.
[1
]
Cham, Matthew D.
[1
]
Wong, Richard
[1
]
Chu, Christopher
[2
]
Min, James K.
[1
,2
]
Prince, Martin R.
[1
]
Wang, Yi
[1
]
Weinsaft, Jonathan W.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Med, Greenberg Div Cardiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词:
cardiac MRI;
ejection fraction;
automated segmentation;
CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE;
CARDIAC MR-IMAGES;
EJECTION FRACTION;
RADIONUCLIDE ANGIOGRAPHY;
AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION;
MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION;
DIASTOLIC FUNCTION;
PAPILLARY-MUSCLES;
VOLUME;
FLOW;
D O I:
10.1002/jmri.22080
中图分类号:
R8 [特种医学];
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100207 ;
1009 ;
摘要:
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of a novel automated left ventricle (LV) segmentation algorithm (LV-METRIC) that involves no geometric assumptions. Materials and Methods: LV-METRIC and manual tracing (MT) were used independently to quantify LV volumes and LVEF (ejection fraction) for 151 consecutive patients who underwent cine-CMR (steady-state free precession). Phase contrast imaging was used to independently measure stroke volume. Results: LV-METRIC was successful in all cases. Mean LVEF was within 1 point of MT (Delta 0.6 +/- 2.3%. P < 0.05), with smaller differences among patients with (0.5 +/- 2.5%) versus those without (0.9 +/- 2.3%; P = 0.01) advanced systolic dysfunction (LVEF <= 35% by MT). LV volumes by LV-METRIC were slightly smaller than MT during end-diastole (3.9 +/- 6.8 mL, P < 0.001) and end-systole (1.4 +/- 5.5 mL, P < 0.01). Mean processing time was 22 +/- 13 seconds for LV-METRIC and 4:59 +/- 1:56 minutes for MT (P < 0.001). Processing time correlated with LV blood volume by MT (r = 0.43) and LV-METRIC (r = 0.55), but slope was 10-fold steeper for MT (0.02 vs. 0.001), indicating greater proportionate time increases in relation to chamber dilation. Compared to stroke volume by phase contrast, LV-METRIC yielded smaller differences (0.3 18.3 mL) than MT (2.5 +/- 17.2 mL; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Among a broad series of consecutive patients undergoing CMR, automated LVEF by LV-METRIC was within 1 point of MT with processing time reduced 14- fold. Stroke volume by LV-METRIC yielded improved agreement with an independent standard of phase contrast imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 853
页数:9
相关论文