The relevance to firm valuation of research and development expenditure in the Australian health-care industry

被引:11
作者
Mitrione, Lorena [1 ]
Tanewski, George [2 ]
Birt, Jacqueline [3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Accounting & Finance, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Fac Business & Law, Sch Accounting Econ & Finance, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, UQ Business Sch, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
biotechnology; capitalised; expenditure; expensed; health care; IAS; 38; research and development; value relevance; FINANCIAL-STATEMENTS; MARKET VALUATION; INFORMATION; CAPITALIZATION; INTANGIBLES; EARNINGS;
D O I
10.1177/0312896213496256
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The health-care industry requires large expenditure on research and development (R&D), with many projects undergoing long development cycles, usually with uncertain outcomes. Extant research has mainly concentrated on the health-care industry in the United States, where R&D costs are expensed as incurred. Previous Australian research has found mixed results in relation to R&D expenditure and changes in share price. This study investigates whether R&D expenditure reported in the health-care industry since the introduction of IAS 38 is significantly associated with share price. Results of the study show that expensed R&D is value-relevant, while a comparison of the pre and post-IAS 38 periods (including pre-global financial crisis (GFC) and GFC periods) shows a statistically significant improvement in the explanatory power of the regression model post-IAS 38, suggesting that R& D expenditure reported under the new standard IAS 38 is more useful for decision-making by investors compared with reporting under AASB 1011.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 452
页数:28
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]  
Bah R, 2001, J BUSINESS FINANCE A, V28, P671
[12]   Accounting losses and earnings conservatism: evidence from Australian generally accepted accounting principles [J].
Balkrishna, Harishankar ;
Coulton, Jeffrey J. ;
Taylor', Stephen L. .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2007, 47 (03) :381-400
[13]   EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF ACCOUNTING INCOME NUMBERS [J].
BALL, R ;
BROWN, P .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1968, 6 (02) :159-178
[14]  
Barth MaryE., 1998, REV ACCOUNT STUD, V3, P41
[15]  
BARTH ME, 1994, ACCOUNT REV, V69, P1
[16]   The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view [J].
Barth, ME ;
Beaver, WH ;
Landsman, WR .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2001, 31 (1-3) :77-104
[17]  
Birt J.L., 2006, AUST J MANAGE, V31, P235
[18]   The real effects of financial constraints: Evidence from a financial crisis [J].
Campello, Murillo ;
Graham, John R. ;
Harvey, Campbell R. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 97 (03) :470-487
[19]   The negative impact of R&D capitalization: A value relevance approach [J].
Cazavan-Jeny, Anne ;
Jeanjean, Thomas .
EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2006, 15 (01) :37-61
[20]   Equity valuation and negative earnings: The role of book value of equity [J].
Collins, DW ;
Pincus, M ;
Xie, H .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1999, 74 (01) :29-61