Does the turgor loss point characterize drought response in dryland plants?

被引:90
作者
Farrell, Claire [1 ]
Szota, Christopher [1 ]
Arndt, Stefan K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Ecosyst & Forest Sci, 500 Yarra Blvd, Richmond, Vic 3121, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
isohydry; P-V curve; TLP; water relations; LEAF WATER RELATIONS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; XYLEM VULNERABILITY; TOLERANCE TRAITS; ADAPTATION; STRESS; SHRUBS; DEHYDRATION; CAVITATION; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1111/pce.12948
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The water potential at turgor loss point (Psi(tlp)) has been suggested as a key functional trait for determining plant drought tolerance, because of its close relationship with stomatal closure. Psi(tlp) may indicate drought tolerance as plants, which maintain gas exchange at lower midday water potentials as soil water availability declines also have lower Psi(tlp). We evaluated 17 species from seasonally dry habitats, representing a range of life-forms, under well-watered and drought conditions, to determine how Psi(tlp) relates to stomatal sensitivity (pre-dawn water potential at stomatal closure: Psi g(s0)) and drought strategy (degree of isohydry or anisohydry; Delta Psi(MD) between well-watered conditions and stomatal closure). Although Psi g(s0) was related to Psi(tlp), Psi g(s0) was better related to drought strategy (Delta Psi(MD)). Drought avoiders (isohydric) closed stomata at water potentials higher than their Psi(tlp); whereas, drought tolerant (anisohydric) species maintained stomatal conductance at lower water potentials than their Psi(tlp) and were more dehydration tolerant. There was no significant relationship between Psi(tlp) and Delta Psi(MD). While Psi(tlp) has been related to biome water availability, we found that Psi(tlp) did not relate strongly to stomatal closure or drought strategy, for either drought avoiders or tolerators. We therefore suggest caution in using Psi(tlp) to predict vulnerability to drought.
引用
收藏
页码:1500 / 1511
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative genomics analysis of drought response between obligate CAM and C3 photosynthesis plants
    Hu, Rongbin
    Zhang, Jin
    Jawdy, Sara
    Sreedasyam, Avinash
    Lipzen, Anna
    Wang, Mei
    Ng, Vivian
    Daum, Christopher
    Keymanesh, Keykhosrow
    Liu, Degao
    Lu, Haiwei
    Ranjan, Priya
    Chen, Jin-Gui
    Muchero, Wellington
    Tschaplinski, Timothy J.
    Tuskan, Gerald A.
    Schmutz, Jeremy
    Yang, Xiaohan
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 277
  • [42] How woody plants adjust above- and below-ground traits in response to sustained drought
    Rowland, Lucy
    Ramirez-Valiente, Jose-Alberto
    Hartley, Iain P.
    Mencuccini, Maurizio
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2023, 239 (04) : 1173 - 1189
  • [43] The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis enhances the photosynthetic efficiency and the antioxidative response of rice plants subjected to drought stress
    Ruiz-Sanchez, Michel
    Aroca, Ricardo
    Munoz, Yaumara
    Polon, Ricardo
    Manuel Ruiz-Lozano, Juan
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 167 (11) : 862 - 869
  • [44] Editorial: Modulation of Stomatal Response by Elevated CO2 in Plants Under Drought and Heat Stress
    Li, Xiangnan
    Palta, Jairo A.
    Liu, Fulai
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [45] Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on leaf gas exchange response to progressive drought in barley and tomato plants with different endogenous ABA levels
    Wei, Zhenhua
    Fang, Liang
    Li, Xiangnan
    Liu, Jie
    Liu, Fulai
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2020, 447 (1-2) : 431 - 446
  • [46] Estimating and analyzing the spatiotemporal characteristics of crop yield loss in response to drought in the koshi river basin, Nepal
    Dahal, Nirmal Mani
    Xiong, Donghong
    Neupane, Nilhari
    Zhang, Su
    Yuan, Yong
    Zhang, Baojun
    Fang, Yiping
    Zhao, Wei
    Wu, Yanhong
    Deng, Wei
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2023, 152 (3-4) : 1053 - 1073
  • [47] How Does the Environment Affect Wheat Yield and Protein Content Response to Drought? A Meta-Analysis
    Wan, Chenxi
    Dang, Pengfei
    Gao, Licheng
    Wang, Jiale
    Tao, Jincai
    Qin, Xiaoliang
    Feng, Baili
    Gao, Jinfeng
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [48] How does the VPD response of isohydric and anisohydric plants depend on leaf surface particles?
    Burkhardt, J.
    Pariyar, S.
    PLANT BIOLOGY, 2016, 18 : 91 - 100
  • [49] Photosynthesis Response and Transcriptional Analysis: Dissecting the Role of SlHB8 in Regulating Drought Resistance in Tomato Plants
    Yang, Yinghua
    Zhang, Xinyue
    Zhong, Qiuxiang
    Liu, Xiaojuan
    Guan, Hongling
    Chen, Riyuan
    Hao, Yanwei
    Yang, Xiaolong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (20)
  • [50] Potassium Nutritional Status Affects Physiological Response of Tamarillo Plants (Cyphomandra betacea Cav.) to Drought Stress
    Clavijo-Sanchez, N.
    Florez-Velasco, N.
    Restrepo-Diaz, H.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 17 : 1839 - 1849