Does the turgor loss point characterize drought response in dryland plants?

被引:90
作者
Farrell, Claire [1 ]
Szota, Christopher [1 ]
Arndt, Stefan K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Ecosyst & Forest Sci, 500 Yarra Blvd, Richmond, Vic 3121, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
isohydry; P-V curve; TLP; water relations; LEAF WATER RELATIONS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; XYLEM VULNERABILITY; TOLERANCE TRAITS; ADAPTATION; STRESS; SHRUBS; DEHYDRATION; CAVITATION; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1111/pce.12948
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The water potential at turgor loss point (Psi(tlp)) has been suggested as a key functional trait for determining plant drought tolerance, because of its close relationship with stomatal closure. Psi(tlp) may indicate drought tolerance as plants, which maintain gas exchange at lower midday water potentials as soil water availability declines also have lower Psi(tlp). We evaluated 17 species from seasonally dry habitats, representing a range of life-forms, under well-watered and drought conditions, to determine how Psi(tlp) relates to stomatal sensitivity (pre-dawn water potential at stomatal closure: Psi g(s0)) and drought strategy (degree of isohydry or anisohydry; Delta Psi(MD) between well-watered conditions and stomatal closure). Although Psi g(s0) was related to Psi(tlp), Psi g(s0) was better related to drought strategy (Delta Psi(MD)). Drought avoiders (isohydric) closed stomata at water potentials higher than their Psi(tlp); whereas, drought tolerant (anisohydric) species maintained stomatal conductance at lower water potentials than their Psi(tlp) and were more dehydration tolerant. There was no significant relationship between Psi(tlp) and Delta Psi(MD). While Psi(tlp) has been related to biome water availability, we found that Psi(tlp) did not relate strongly to stomatal closure or drought strategy, for either drought avoiders or tolerators. We therefore suggest caution in using Psi(tlp) to predict vulnerability to drought.
引用
收藏
页码:1500 / 1511
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Growth and water relations in mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal Pinus halepensis plants in response to drought
    Morte, A
    Díaz, G
    Rodríguez, P
    Alarcón, JJ
    Sánchez-Blanco, MJ
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2001, 44 (02) : 263 - 267
  • [32] Does an extreme drought event alter the response of grassland communities to a changing climate?
    Naudts, K.
    Van den Berge, J.
    Janssens, I. A.
    Nijs, I.
    Ceulemans, R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2011, 70 (2-3) : 151 - 157
  • [33] Response of Barley Plants to Drought Might Be Associated with the Recruiting of Soil-Borne Endophytes
    Yang, Luhua
    Schroeder, Peter
    Vestergaard, Gisle
    Schloter, Michael
    Radl, Viviane
    MICROORGANISMS, 2020, 8 (09) : 1 - 18
  • [34] An increase in xylem embolism resistance of grapevine leaves during the growing season is coordinated with stomatal regulation, turgor loss point and intervessel pit membranes
    Sorek, Yonatan
    Greenstein, Smadar
    Netzer, Yishai
    Shtein, Ilana
    Jansen, Steven
    Hochberg, Uri
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2021, 229 (04) : 1955 - 1969
  • [35] Acclimation of barley plants to elevated CO2 concentration and high light intensity does not increase their protection against drought, heat, and their combination
    Findurova, Hana
    Urban, Otmar
    Vesela, Barbora
    Nezval, Jakub
    Pech, Radomir
    Spunda, Vladimir
    Klem, Karel
    PLANT STRESS, 2024, 14
  • [36] Does engineering abscisic acid biosynthesis in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia modify stomatal response to drought?
    Borel, C
    Frey, A
    Marion-Poll, A
    Tardieu, F
    Simonneau, T
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 24 (05) : 477 - 489
  • [37] Ultrasonic spectroscopy allows a rapid determination of the relative water content at the turgor loss point: a comparison with pressure-volume curves in 13 woody species
    Sancho-Knapik, Domingo
    Javier Peguero-Pina, Jose
    Dolores Farinas, Maria
    Gomez Alvarez-Arenas, Tomas
    Gil-Pelegrin, Eustaquio
    TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 33 (07) : 695 - 700
  • [38] Photosynthetic Response, Biomass Distribution and Water Status Changes in Rhamnus alaternus Plants during Drought
    Alvarez, S.
    Castillo, M.
    Acosta, J. R.
    Navarro, A.
    Sanchez-Blanco, M. J.
    XXVIII INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS ON SCIENCE AND HORTICULTURE FOR PEOPLE (IHC2010): INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCES IN ORNAMENTALS, LANDSCAPE AND URBAN HORTICULTURE, 2012, 937 : 853 - 860
  • [39] Sweet Cherry Plants Prioritize Their Response to Cope with Summer Drought, Overshadowing the Defense Response to Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae
    Villalobos-Gonzalez, Luis
    Carreras, Claudia
    Beltran, Maria Francisca
    Figueroa, Franco
    Rubilar-Hernandez, Carlos
    Opazo, Ismael
    Toro, Guillermo
    Salvatierra, Ariel
    Sagredo, Boris
    Pizarro, Lorena
    Fiore, Nicola
    Pinto, Manuel
    Arbona, Vicent
    Gomez-Cadenas, Aurelio
    Pimentel, Paula
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2024, 13 (13):
  • [40] Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought:: Stomatal conductance as a reference parameter
    Medrano, H
    Escalona, JM
    Bota, J
    Gulías, J
    Flexas, J
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2002, 89 : 895 - 905