Aircraft Noise Distribution as a Fairness Dilemma-A Review of Aircraft Noise through the Lens of Social Justice Research

被引:12
作者
Hauptvogel, Dominik [1 ]
Bartels, Susanne [1 ,2 ]
Schreckenberg, Dirk [3 ]
Rothmund, Tobias [4 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr, Inst Aerosp Med Sleep & Human Factors Res, D-51147 Cologne, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Dept Human Sci, Work & Engn Psychol Res Grp, Alexanderstr 10, D-64283 Darmstadt, Germany
[3] ZEUS GmbH, Zentrum Angew Psychol Umwelt & Sozialforsch, Sennbrink 46, D-58093 Hagen, Germany
[4] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, Inst Commun Sci, Ernst Abbe Pl 8, D-07743 Jena, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
fairness; justice; procedural; distributional; informational; interpersonal; aircraft noise; aviation; annoyance; AIRPORT NOISE; TRANSPORTATION NOISE; ANNOYANCE; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT; EXPOSURE; INFANTS; CONTEXT; SLEEP;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18147399
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aircraft noise exposure is a health risk and there is evidence that noise annoyance partly mediates the association between noise exposure and stress-related health risks. Thus, approaches to reduce annoyance may be beneficial for health. Annoyance is influenced by manifold non-acoustic factors and perceiving a fair and trustful relationship between the airport and its residents may be one of them. The distribution of aircraft noise exposure can be regarded as a fairness dilemma: while residents living near an airport may seem to have some advantages, the majority of residents living under certain flight routes or in their immediate proximity suffer from the disadvantages of the airport, especially the noise. Moreover, a dilemma exists between the airport's beneficial economic impact for a region and the physical and psychological integrity of residents. Aircraft noise exposure through the lens of social justice research can help to improve our understanding of noise annoyance. Research indicates that the fairness perceptions of the parties involved can be enhanced by (a) improving individual cost-benefit ratios, (b) providing a fair procedure for deciding upon the noise distribution, and (c) implementing fair social interaction with residents. Based on the review of evidence from social justice research, we derive recommendations on how fairness aspects can be integrated into aircraft noise management with the purpose of improving the relationship between the airport and its residents, to reduce annoyance, and to enhance the acceptance of local aviation and the airport as a neighbor.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
Alexander S., 1987, SOCIAL JUSTICE RES, V1, P177, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01048015
[3]  
Ancona C, 2014, EPIDEMIOL PREV, V38, P227
[4]  
[Anonymous], BBC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1984, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0272-4944(84)80004-3
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1987, UTILITARIANISM
[7]   Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction [J].
Babisch, WF ;
Beule, B ;
Schust, M ;
Kersten, N ;
Ising, H .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (01) :33-40
[8]   Noise annoyance - A modifier of the association between noise level and cardiovascular health? [J].
Babisch, Wolfgang ;
Pershagen, Goran ;
Selander, Jenny ;
Houthuijs, Danny ;
Breugelmans, Oscar ;
Cadum, Ennio ;
Vigna-Taglianti, Federica ;
Katsouyanni, Klea ;
Haralabidis, Alexandros S. ;
Dimakopoulou, Konstantina ;
Sourtzi, Panayota ;
Floud, Sarah ;
Hansell, Anna L. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 452 :50-57
[9]  
Babisch Wolfgang, 2002, Noise Health, V4, P1
[10]  
Bartels S., 2014, THESIS TU DARMSTADT